Like, I had always known, there, I have the evidence now on the fact, that the French Government, we had misinformation , you will tell me, on suspected failure, we knew, like me and many others, in short, ‘we’, taking Bashar Al-ASSAD, like an evil dictator, tyrannical and perverse, what is Archie fake, of course , as Ministers and valls and Holland, and others, taubira, tourainne, valleaud, and I forgot ROYAL, which themselves are échinés to mislead us, as they do, so much so, as to their habits of Masons franc (Incidentally, you cannot find the word FRANC is too, finally, I say that, because, you are not (, and masons, even less,) they thought, certainly than we were not able of is suspected, that with all FIBS, what they tell in normal times, it was the fabrication.
France media admit that the Syrian « Opposition » is Al Qaeda. Then justifies the support of the French Government to terrorists, (so Al Qaida, if I understand correctly!, finally chais, I wonder!)
François Hollande pacte
In a report published on 11Th of April French daily Le Monde as admits that the rebels fighting the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic are dominated by Japhat Al Nosra, a terrorist group linked to Al Qaida. The admission follows two years of misinformation nonstop trumpeted by all mainstream media French official left an employee right, misinformation that tried to convince the public that revolutionary French democratic are engaged in a war for the rights of man and freedom against a brutal, tyrannical, dictator who is ‘kill his own people.
This childlike and profoundly dishonest narrative has now been totally discredited, because the facts on the terrorist nature of Syrian rebels have become too obvious to ignore. In an article titled ‘The new face of French Jihad’, it is reported that jihadists French leave the France of hundreds to join the « holy war » against Syria, with many more joining Mali jihadist groups.
On the same page in an article entitled « Al Qaida extends its territory and unites its forces in Iraq and Syria », reports the world’s Christophe Ayad:
« The head of the Islamic State of Iraq, the Iraqi branch of Al-Qaida, announced in a recorded message on April 9Th, that his group could be merged with the Japhat AL Dhanub (before support), the principal armed organization Jihad in Syria. The new group will be called Al-Qaida in Iraq and the Levant. The announcement comes two days after the appeal of Ayman Al-Zawarhiri, the successor of Osama bin Laden in the direction of Al-Qaida ‘seat’, the creation of an Islamic State after the fall of the regime of Bashar Al-Assad, grieved for two years by an insurgency by the Sunni majority. «  $2/2
So, here we have the press of the French establishment, who works overtime for two years, in order to convince us that these fights Assad are Democrats, acknowledging that they are in fact of Al Qaida. According to a news report from 2010Fox October, the leader of Al Qaida above Al-Zawarhiri dined at month Pentagon just after 911. Journalist for Fox News Catherine Herridge said she had documents that prove this. Of course, Fox News is a company propaganda agency did not pursue this story any more, nor have any other international media outlets. In the war against terrorism, ignorance is strength and questioning is stupid.  Fox News reporter earns $ 900,000 per year. 
In order to limit the damage and reassure readers French support of the Quai d’Orsay for the « rebels » does not contradict the commitment of France to the ‘human rights’, the world’s Christophe Ayad tells us that:
« Against the Islamic State in Iraq, Al Dhanub Front have made an effort not to systematically to target civilians. » He did not insist, for now, to impose an Islamic order which is too strict in areas under its control and has even honourable agreements with the Kurdish rebellion, as in Ras Al – Ain and most recently in Aleppo « 
These rebels the world tries to whitewash took systematically targeting civilians since the beginning of this conflict. They have placed bombs in cars on the busy market places, they bombed universities, killing and maiming hundreds of innocent civilians. They have been tortured and beheading civilians and soldiers alike , even forcing children to participate in the beheading some of their victims. Children have also been used as soldiers. 
They have forced women to wear the chador in the regions ‘released’ Aleppo both nice.  they desecrated and religious and cultural heritage of the country in ruins. They have blown up pipelines and destroyed infrastructure. They have destroyed thousands of schools, libraries and public service buildings. They have used chemical weapons. They have cracked the throat of small children to blame the Syrian Government. They terrorists are now even take pictures of themselves with the heads decapitated their victims.  none of this is secret. They have posted videos touting their crimes at all times.
Yet, The world wants us to believe that Japhat Al Dhanub [image above] is a good more civilized version of Al Qaida, we perhaps worthy of military support from the West! Of course, the World will respond that they do not support Japhat Al Nosra, that they support the secular rebels. But where are the secular rebels? Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and political rights stipulates very clearly that « propaganda in favour of war is prohibited by law’.  the attempt by Western journalists to represent terrorists and freedom fighters and the use of sources of information exclusively these groups to justify foreign aggression against a sovereign State recognized by the United Nations constitutes a war crime.
The French « special envoy » seems to bemoan the fact that the announcement of this new fusion terrorist groups to discredit the French Government’s attempts to convince its partners in the European Union to arm officially the rebellion. While the French press admits that the Syrian armed opposition is mainly Al-Qaida, he continues to insinuate and suggest that most of the armed opposition indeed is secular and liberal. However, no evidence to support these innuendoes has always been next, while the evidence to the contrary is overwhelming and impossible to reject.
In another article published March 5Th entitled « Syrian rebels take control of the town of Raqqa in the North of the country, » the journalist Khaled Sid Mohand tells us just who are these « rebel ». They are, he admits a few lines in his report:
« A coalition of armed groups, including some are affiliated with the Japhat-al-Dhanub jihadists, who are originally from the fall of Rakka. » 
What a beauty! Al Qaeda captured a Syrian village and the French liberal media seem to be very excited about the idea of barbarians armed with the Levantine State. The title of the article, one is led to believe that the Syrian rebels took the town, the Syrian rebels being media French designated the good guys ‘Arab spring ‘. Therefore, even if the news is bad, the title suggests that it is good. Reality is turned upside down.
This technique of editorials terrorist as rebels, while at the same time admit they are terrorists has the effect of confusing the public and preventing the critical reader to understand the real forces at play in the Syrian conflict. The technique was used on several occasions during the Russia-Chechen war when Islamic terrorists have repeatedly described as « rebels ». The double standard, double-speak and double – think are techniques that are now an integral part of « professional journalism ».
If such heinous and schizophrenic behavior may appear to some as a diabolical conspiracy, the reality is much more complex. This schizoid way of thinking and the floor is simply the psychological reflection of a global economic system that is collapsing on its internal contradictions. Extraction of added value of the work and the globalization of the capitalist mode of production is a tiny world population part extremely rich and powerful.
The rich and powerful non only have means of production, they are also owners of the means of communication and as rule by a financial oligarchy is objectively contrary to democratic principles, a dual-language and double – think is necessary to make believe that 2 plus 2 equals 5. Consequently, the armed groups that serve the interests of the financial oligarchy will be publicized as activists ‘freedom fighters’ and ‘human rights ‘. However, as journalists cannot always control or ignore the complex realities that they report the truth emerges also between the lines, in the margins and crevices of their own speech. However, the work of rational analysis and interpretation of information are only made today by alternative media whose purpose is to serve the public good and tell the truth.
Thus, articles reporting the « good news » that the Syrian rebels took another city will also have to admit that these same rebels are actually Al Qaida. But because the double – think is deeply rooted in Western culture, the contradictions in these reports are rarely noticed or analyzed the task of the public mind to support the geopolitical strategies ‘cruel but necessary’ falling global financial elites for mass media, which guide and distort the information based on the imperial designs and the interests of the owners of molding media companies.
In an article in the Guardian in 2002, the West’s total hypocrisy settlement policy was eloquently expressed by the former British Prime Minister Tony Blair Robert Cooper chief strategist who wrote:
« The challenge for the postmodern world is to get used to the idea of two weights two measures. » Between us, we work on the basis of laws and open cooperative security. But when it comes to the oldest types of States outside the postmodern Europe continent, we must return to the rougher methods from another era – force, pre-emptive, deceit, all that is needed to deal with those who still live in the world of the 19th century of all States for himself. Between us, we observe the law, but when we live in the jungle, we must also use the laws of the jungle »
As unknown gunmen opened fire on the demonstrators and the police in the city of Daraa March 15Th2011, the Syrian nation was attacked by death squads armed and trained by the Gulf Emirates and NATO intelligence. The result was the death of thousands and the destruction of a nation. It is a repetition of the Arc of crisis created in Afghanistan in 1979 when US National Security Advisor Zbigniew Bzrezinski organized the arming and training of the Mujahideen terrorists to overthrow the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan. The result was the creation of Al Qaida, a database of active military intelligence, which have since any beginner, always served the geopolitical interests of NATO. The same technique is now being used against the Syria.
It is fort possible admission by the French Government that Al Qaida were resumed in much of the Syria could serve as an excuse in the weeks, months or years to come for direct to ‘free’ of the Syria of Al-Qaida military intervention, just as the promotion of intelligence French of Jihad in Libya and their transfer to the Mali served the cause of military intervention , it. Meanwhile, the media demonization of Bachar Al Assad will continue. However, the existence of Al Qaïda in Syria could become the final intervention rationale if terrorists are able to sufficiently weaken the Syrian State and the Russia can be brought to accept the loss of its Eastern Mediterranean client state.
The dupes of the media empire of NATO can continue to comfort themselves that their Governments are fighting terrorists in some countries, while helping « democratic rebels » the militarization of urban space and fight « brutal regimes » in others, but the wild austerity cuts affects of European cities, the reality that it is the Euro-Atlantic elites degenerate who are fomenting jihadist terrorism , the nightmarish reality that it is in fact both the « brutal regime », and opaque, loose ‘terrorist network’ who wants to take away our freedoms and destroy civilization, this reality will become impossible to ignore. Verily the war against terrorism is a war against humanity.
‘ Unlike the Islamic State in Iraq, the Front Al-Dhanub takes care to not step target always civilians. He has avoided, pour l’instant,imposing a too-strict Islamic order in areas under his control and finds even ad hoc agreements with the Kurdish rebellion, as in Ras Al – Ain, and most recently at Aleppo.’
The Pentagon report: U.S. « created » ISIS as a ‘tool’ to overthrow President Assad of Syria
Since the first appearance suddenly and quite dramatic, fanatic Islamic group called ISIS who was largely unknown until one year before, on the world stage and quickly replaced the door out and tired of al-Qaida as a terrorist bogeyman of the world, we have suggested that the « directly to the beheading of clip on YouTube » purpose behind the Islamic State funded by Saudi Arabia was very simple : using jihadists as the vehicle of choice to achieve a goal: drop of Syrian president Assad, which for years has prevented a critical Qatari natural gas pipeline, which could dethrone the Russia as the dominant – and belligerent Europe – energy source, to reach a provisional peak Stoppers military Mediterranean accumulation of 2013, which almost led to almost world War
The narration and plot were so transparent, even Russia has seen throughout of their. Remember September of last year :
If the West bomb militant Islamic State in Syria without Damascus, LiveLeak reports that the anti-ISIS alliance can seize the opportunity to launch air strikes against the forces of President Bashar Assad, according to the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergueï Lavrov. Clearly understand that new Obama strategy ISIS in Syria is all about pushing the Qatar pipeline (as was the impetus behind the push of intervention 2013), Russia grows noting that it’s back using ISIS as a pretext to bombard the strength of the Syrian Governments and warning that « such a development would lead to a huge escalation of the conflict in the Middle East and North Africa .. »
But it is one thing to speculate; It is something quite different to have hard proof.
And rampant speculation that just as the CIA al-Qaeda-funded had been used as a front by the United States to achieve its own geopolitical interests and national during the past two decades, ISIS was nothing more than al-Qaida 2.0, only there was no real evidence of this.
That may all change now when a secret document declassified U.S. Government obtained by the public interest, Judicial Watch, shows that the Governments firm Westerners deliberately allied to al-Qaeda and other extremist Islamist groups to overthrow the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad.
According to investigative journalist Nafeez Ahmed on average, « leaked document reveals that, in coordination with the Gulf States and Turkey, the West intentionally sponsored by violent Islamist groups to destabilize Assad, despite anticipation that doing so could lead to the emergence of a » Islamic « in Iraq and State in Syria (ISIS).
According to the newly declassified US document, the Pentagon provided the likely increase of the « Islamic State » as a direct result of the strategy, but describes this result as a strategic opportunity « to isolate the Syrian regime. »
And not just that: as we reported last week , now ISIS turns around the Middle East, cutting quality 1080 p and Hollywood-quality people’s heads (perhaps literally) video, the United States has a credible justification to sell billions worth of modern and sophisticated weapons in the region in order to ‘modernize’ and ‘restore’ the weapons of these allies of the United States like Saudi Arabia Israel and the Iraq.
But the American military-industrial complex is a winner whenever war broke out anywhere the world (usually with the help of the CIA) is clear to everyone now. What was not clear, it’s just how the United States predetermined the current course of events in the Middle East.
Now, thanks to the declassified report next, we have a much better understanding not only how many events to current events in the Middle East came to be, but the role of puppermaster of America leading to all this was.
By Nafeez Ahmed: Secret report Pentagon reveals what West saw ISIS as asset strategic coalition anti-ISIS sponsored knowingly violent extremists to « isolate » Assad, rollback ‘Expansion of Shia’, Posted in medium . £ 2/2
isis US role_0Hypocrisy
The revelations are contrary to the official line of the Western Government on their policy in Syria and raise troubling questions about secret Western support abroad violent extremists while using the emerging threat of terror to justify excessive monitoring of mass and the repression of civil liberties at home.
Among the batch of documents obtained by Judicial Watch through a trial federal, published earlier this week, is a Document of the US defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) and then classified « secret, » dated August 12, 2012.
DIA provides it with military intelligence services in support of planners, policy makers and the U.S. Department of defense and intelligence operations.
So far, media focused on the evidence that the Obama administration was aware of the supply of arms to the rebels in Syria of a Libyan stronghold of terrorists.
Some have reported internal prediction of the American community of intelligence of the rise of ISIS. Yet none have recognized accurately the disturbing details expose how the West has knowingly promoted a sectarian rebellion, led by al-Qaeda in Syria.
Charles Shoebridge, a former British army and Metropolitan Police anti-terrorist intelligence officer, said:
« Given political orientation of the organization who has obtained these documents, it is without surprise that the main emphasis that is given so far has been an attempt to embarrass Hilary Clinton about what they knew on the attack against the US Consulate in Benghazi in 2012. However, the documents also containing much less publicized revelations that raise very important questions Governments and media in their support of the rebellion of the Syria of the West. »
Islamists in the West
The DIA newly declassified document partir starting 2012, confirms that the main component of the rebel forces anti-Assad at this time includes Islamist insurgents affiliated with groups that would lead to the emergence of ISIS. Despite this, these groups should continue to receive the support of Western military forces and their regional allies.
Noting that « the Salafists [sic], the Muslim Brotherhood and AQI [al Qaeda in Iraq] are the main forces driving the insurgency in Syria, » the document mentions that « West, Gulf countries and Turkey the opposition support, » while the Russia, China and the Iran « support regime [Assad] ». » »
Document DIA 7 pages indicates that al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), the precursor of the « Islamic State in Iraq », (ISI) which became the « Islamic State in Iraq and Syria,’ ‘ supported Syrian opposition since the beginning, ideologically both through media. » »
The formerly secret Pentagon report notes that the ‘rise of the insurrection in Syria’ has increasingly taken a « sectarian, meaning » attracts support diverse Sunni « religious powers and tribes » throughout the region.
In an article entitled « The Future assumptions of the crisis, » the report from DIA provides that while retaining control over the Syrian territory, the Assad regime will survive the crisis will continue to degenerate « into war by proxy »
The document also recommends the creation of « safe areas under shelter international, similar to what has passed in Libya when Benghazi has been chosen as the command centre for the temporary Government.
In Libya, rebel anti-Gaddafi, most of which was militia al-Qaida affiliate, were protected by NATO ‘sanctuaries’ (aka ‘no fly zones’).
«Support motorized want « entity ISIS
In a surprisingly prescient prediction, the Pentagon document explicitly provides the probable declaration of ‘an Islamic State through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria’.
Nevertheless, « Western countries, the Gulf States and the Turkey supports these efforts » in Syrian « opposition forces » fighting to « control the eastern areas (wafa and Der Zor), adjacent to the Western provinces Iraqi (Mosul and Anbar) »:
« … There is the ability to create a Principality Salafi declared or undeclared in Eastern Syria (wafa and Der Zor), and this is exactly what want the powers of support to the opposition, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered to be the strategic expansion of Shia (Iraq and Iran) depth. »
The Pentagon secret document therefore provides special confirmation that the coalition led by the United States currently fighting ISIS, had three years ago has welcomed the emergence of an extremist « Salafist Principality » in the region to undermine the Assad and the strategic expansion of the Iran block. It is essential, Iraq is labeled as an integral part of this « Shia expansion. »
The establishment of such a « Salafist Principality » in Eastern Syria, document DIA says, is « exactly » as the support powers in the absence of opposition [Syria]. More early on, repeatedly describes « supporters of powers » as « the West, the Gulf countries and the Turkey. »
Furthermore, the document reveals that the Pentagon analysts were perfectly aware of the terrible risks of this strategy still ploughed before anyway.
Implementation of such a « Salafist Principality » in Eastern Syria, it is said, would create « an ideal atmosphere for AQI return to his old pockets in Mosul and Ramadi » . « Last summer, conquered ISIS in Mosul in Iraq, and nothing that this month has also taken control of Ramadi.
A quasi-public entity will provide:
« … a momentum renewed under the presumption of unify jihad among Iraq Sunnis and the Syria and the rest of the Sunnis in the Arab world against what he considers an enemy. ISI could also declare an Islamic State through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create the great danger with regard to unifying Iraq and the protection of the territory. »
Document DIA 2012 is an informational report Intelligence (IIR), not a review ‘finally evaluated intelligence’, but its content is validated prior to distribution. The report was distributed throughout the U.S. intelligence community, including the Department of State, command Central, the Department of Homeland Security, CIA, FBI, among other institutions.
In response to my questions on strategy, the British Government simply denied surprising revelations of the report Pentagon’s deliberate Western sponsorship of violent extremists in Syria. A spokesman for the British Foreign Office said:
«AQ and ISIL are banned terrorist organizations. The United Kingdom opposes all forms of terrorism. AQ, ISIL and their subsidiaries constitute a direct threat to the national security of the United Kingdom. We are part of a political and military coalition to defeat in Iraq and Syria ISIL and collaborate with international partners to counter the threat of the QA and other terrorist groups in the region. In Syria we have always supported the moderate opposition groups who oppose the tyranny of Assad and the brutality of the extremists. »
DIA did not responded it to the request for comment.
Strategic asset for regime change
Shoebridge security analyst, however, that followed the Western support for Islamic terrorists in Syria since the beginning of the war, has stressed that the Pentagon secret intelligence report exposes the fatal contradictions at the heart of the official pronunciation:
« The early years of the crisis of the Syria, the American and British Governments and almost universally the mainstream media of the West, promoted Syria rebels as moderate, liberal, secular, democratic and therefore worthy of support from the West. » « Given that these documents completely undermine this assessment, it is significant that the media of the West has now, despite their immense importance, almost entirely ignored ».
According to Brad Hoff, a former American soldier who served during the early years of the war in Iraq and as a 9/11 first intervening on the headquarters of the Marine Corps at Quantico battalion from 2000 to 2004, the just published report of the Pentagon for the first time provides an amazing affirmation that:
« Intelligence services US predicted the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), but instead to clearly delineate the group as an enemy, the report envisages the terrorist group as a strategic American asset. »
Hoff, who is editor in Chief of the management Report of the rising -? an online publication run by Texas educators who have direct experience in the Middle East? —? pointed out that the document DIA « prosaically » indicates that upward of a such extremist Salafi political entity in the region provides a ‘tool of regime change in Syria. »
The intelligence report DIA shows, he said, that the birth of ISIS became possible under the Syrian insurrection? —? « There is no mention of us withdrawal of troops from Iraq as a catalyst for the rise of the Islamic State, which is the contention of many politicians and experts. » The report shows that:
« Setting up a »Salafist Principality »in Eastern Syria is »exactly »what the external powers supporting the lack of opposition (identified as » West, the Gulf countries and the Turkey « ) in order to weaken the Assad Government.
The rise of an entity quasi-State Salafist who may increase in Iraq and that country, the divide was so clearly provided by the US as probable intelligence services? —? But however strategically useful? —? blowback of the commitment of the West to « isolate the Syria. »
Critics of American policy in the region have repeatedly raised questions about the role of coalition allies by voluntarily providing support extended to Islamist terrorist groups in the drive to destabilize the regime of Assad in Syria.
The conventional wisdom is that the U.S. Government did not retain sufficient supervision over the financing of groups rebels anti-Assad, which was supposed to be monitored and controlled to ensure that only « moderate » groups have been supported.
On the other hand, the recently declassified Pentagon report proves unequivocally that years before ISIS launched its offensive coordinated against the Iraq, the American intelligence community was fully aware that Islamic militants constituted the nucleus of the sectarian insurgency of the Syria.
Despite this, the Pentagon continued to support the Islamist insurgency, while anticipating the likelihood that this would then prepare a Salafist extremist stronghold in Syria and Iraq.
As Shoebridge told me, «the documents show that not only the U.S. Government at the latest in August 2012 knew the true extremist character and the probable outcome of the rebellion of the Syria»? —? namely the emergence of ISIS? « ? » but that it was considered as an advantage for American foreign policy. This also suggests a decision to spend years in an effort to deliberately mislead the public in the West, by a compatible media, making them believe that the rebellion of the Syria was overwhelmingly ‘moderate’. »
Annie Machon , a former MI5 intelligence officer who denounced in the 1990s on MI6 funding of al-Qaida to assassinate the former leader Libyan Colonel Gaddafi, said the same of revelations:
« This is no surprise to me. In each country there are always several agencies of information to competing programs. »
She explained that Libya’s MI6 operation in 1996, that caused the death of innocent people, « arrived precisely at the moment when MI5 has set up a new section to investigate al-Qaida ».
This strategy was repeated on a large scale in the Libya 2011 NATO’s intervention, said Machon, where the CIA and MI6 have been:
« … support the same Libyan groups, leading to a failed State, mass murder it, displacement and lawlessness. So the idea that the elements of the American military-security complex have allowed the development of ISIS after their failed attempt to obtain NATO once more ‘intervene’ is an established model. And they remain indifferent to the magnitude of human suffering that is triggered as a result of this games. »
Divide and reign
Several American Government officials have admitted that their closest allies of the anti-ISIS coalition financed violent extremist Islamist groups that have become an integral part of the ISIS.
US Vice President Joe Biden, for example, admitted last year that Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and United Arab Emirates have channeled hundreds of millions of dollars to the Islamist rebels in Syria who metamorphosed into ISIS.
But he did not admit that shows this internal document of the Pentagon? -? that whole strategy secret was sanctioned and supervised by the United States, Britain, France, Israel and other Western powers.
The strategy seems if adapt to a policy scenario identified by a recent commissioned by US Army RAND Corp. report.
The report, published four years before the document, called the United States « to »capitalize on the Shia-Sunni conflict by taking the party of conservative Sunni regimes of decisively and working with them against all movements for the empowerment of Shiites in the Muslim world. »
The United States must contain « Iranian power and influence » in the Gulf to « consolidate the traditional Sunni regimes in Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Pakistan. At the same time, the United States must maintain « a strong strategic relationship with the Iraqi Shiite government » despite his alliance of Iran.
Report of the RAND confirmed that the strategy « divides and reigns » was already deployed « in order to create divisions in the camp of jihadists. Today in Iraq such a strategy is used at the tactical level. »
Report pointed out as the United States formed « of temporary alliances » with al-Qaeda Affiliate « nationalist insurgent groups » who fought in the United States for four years in the form of « weapons and silver.. Although these nationalists « have cooperated with al-Qaida against U.S. forces, » they are now supported to exploit « the common threat that al-Qaida is for both parties. »
The DIA 2012 document, however, more shows that sponsoring insurgents allegedly former al-Qaida in Iraq against al-Qaida, Western Governments were simultaneously arming the insurgents of al-Qaida in Syria.
The revelation of an internal document of intelligence from the United States that the very so-called American coalition fighting ‘Islamic State’ today, knowingly created ISIS first, raises troubling questions about the Government’s recent efforts to justify the enlargement of the powers of fight against State terrorism.
In the wake of the rise of ISIS, intrusive new measures to combat extremism, including the monitoring of mass, the Orwellian « prevents a duty » and even plans allow Government broadcasters censorship, continued on both sides of the Atlantic, whose much disproportionately targets militants, journalists and ethnic minorities, especially Muslims.
Yet, the new Pentagon report reveals that, contrary to the assertions of the Government of West , the main cause of the threat comes from their own deeply flawed policy of secretly sponsoring Islamist terrorism for geopolitical purposes questionable.
Dr Nafeez Ahmed is an investigative journalist, author success and international security. A former editor of the guardian, he writes the column « Shift System » for motherboard defect and is also a columnist for the eye of the Middle East. « It is the 2015 project censored Award winner, known as the ‘ Alternative Pulitzer Prize ‘, for for his work of goalkeeper remarkable investigative journalism and was selected in the Evening Standard ‘power 1 000’ most influential Londoners in the world.
Wrote for The Independent, The Age, Sydney Morning Herald, The Scotsman, foreign policy, Atlantic, Quartz, prospect, New Statesman, Le Monde diplomatique, New Internationalist, Counterpunch, Truthout, among others. He is the author of user’s Guide has the crisis of civilization: and How to Save It (2010) and the sci-fi thriller novel ZERO POINT, among other books. His work on the root causes and covert operations related to international terrorism have officially contributed to the 9/11 Commission and the 7/7 inquest.
Why Washington is gone after FIFA
Posted by talesfromtheconspiratum on June 4, 2015
Posted in: Banking cabal , Corruption , Criminology , Justice , law , Political Science . Tagged: FIFA, PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS Washington, Russia. 2 comments
Pray all you want Sepp, the evil forces have spoken
Why Washington is gone after FIFA
by PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
Washington attack on world football follows the script of Washington on the Winter Olympics Sochi Russia-hosted attack. The difference is that Washington could not stop the inmate in Sochi Olympics and was limited to scare Westerners of lies and propaganda. In the current scandal orchestrated by Washington, Washington intends to use its takeover of FIFA to reconsider the decision to FIFA that host the next World Cup of Russia.
This is part of the agenda of Washington to isolate the Russia in the world.
This orchestrated scandal Washington stinks to high heaven. It seems clear that the FIFA officials have been arrested for reasons political and only recently massively re-elected President of FIFA, Sepp Blatter, is forced to resign by threats from Washington to charge him as well. This can happen because Washington is no longer subject to the rule of law. In the hands of Washington, law is a weapon that is used against everyone, all organizations and all countries that adopt a position independent of Washington.
This clears the deck for Washington and its British doggies to seize of FIFA, which will now be used to reward countries that meet Washington’s foreign policy and to punish those who are pursuing an independent foreign policy.
The only hope for South America, in Asia and Russia is to form their own World Cup to turn our backs on the corrupt West.
It is surprising that Russia, Asia and South America so much want to be part of the Western world corrupt and immoral. Why countries wish to be associated with evil? Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia and perhaps the Brazil the Argentina have learned to be in means of the Western orbit involving their country under control of Washington.
Putin, Lavrov and leaders China say that being associated with the West is like being associated with the plague. Yet, they still want to be associated with the West. Why the Russia and China, that self-esteem depends on the approval of Washington?
FIFA is an organisation based in Switzerland. Yet the arrests of FIFA officials is based on an ‘investigation’ initiated by Washington by the FBI. In affirming the universality of American law, Washington asserting the authority of the police and prosecutors in sovereign countries.
Why the Switzerland, and why other countries provide in obedience to the affirmation of the universality of its laws Washington? Political leaders are reimbursed or are they threatened with assassination or false indictments? What explains that, of all the countries on Earth, only the Washington law are universal, recognized and bowed down before in other countries? So is fear of retaliation?
Perhaps, but one answer is that the whole point of being a leader of a foreign country must be enriched to bend to Washington. A year on the desktop and Tony Blair were reported to be worth $50 million. Where the money came from? No one wanted to listen to speeches by Tony Blair when he was Prime Minister. Why the Americans caused him to pay six-figure sums to make speeches?
Putin may become rich, too. All they have to do is deliver the Russia to Washington.
We are here in a scandal orchestrated soccer rising to the end by the presstitute media so that all scandals real gone unnoticed.
For example, a number of mega-banks of the West have pleaded guilty to charges only and criminal fines has suffered. As noted by Finian Cunningham, money laundering, and price-rigging by the ‘too-big banks in prison’ dwarfs the crime presumed to FIFA. The Securities and Exchange Commission effectively issues waivers to banks for their criminal activities. A dissenting Commissioner of SEC accuses his colleagues of encouraging « recidivism » by the constant problem of waivers.
Washington itself cannot be estimated as not a single important mouth of Washington declaration since the Clinton plan was the case; Yet Washington still parades around as the arbiter of truth.
Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. Assad has not used chemical weapons. The Iran doesn’t have a nuclear weapons program. The Russia has not invaded the Ukraine. But Washington has convinced the world that his lies were true.
It is almost a certainty that politicians in arms on baseless charges that FIFA took the bribes themselves have taken bribes. Just look at the required bribes companies Congress to vote accelerated made.
Anyone can name even a leader of a country of the EU (except perhaps the Greece at present) who takes bribes to Washington?
According to Udo Ulfkotte, no one can cite even a British or newspaper EU taking bribes of the CIA.
How a votes are determined by the threats from Washington and bribes?
Whether or not the decisions of FIFA are tainted by corruption, the ‘investigation’ is intended to cast doubt on the decision to organize the the World Cup in Russia. The World Cup is a global event and vehicle prestige on the host country. Washington intends to refuse this prestige in Russia. This is what the « investigation ».
Paul Craig Roberts is a former Deputy Secretary of the US Treasury and Deputy Editor of the Wall Street Journal. Roberts’ how the economy was lost is now available from CounterPunch in electronic format. His the last book, it is How America lost.
Netanyahu tackles boycott Israel National Union of Students’
Boycott Israel! $1/3
Israel boycott 729 made in Israel
June 4, 2015 $2/3
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Reuters/Jack Guez)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Reuters/Jack Guez)
Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has attacked the Executive Committee of National Union of students (NUS) from the United Kingdom to adopt a motion to boycott Israeli products. It marks its incompatible policies after she rejected a call to ban Islamic State.
Higher Committee of NUS voted to boycott Israeli goods Tuesday in solidarity with the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement, which aims to put economic pressure on Israel over its actions in the Palestinian territory.
Netanyahu said that the NUDES were hypocritical for the ban on Israeli goods while refusing to embargo the Islamic State (formerly ISIS/ISIL).
» » It comes less than a year after they refused to support a boycott of ISIS, « Netanyahu said during a meeting with Canadian Foreign Minister Robert Nicholson in Jerusalem. »
» » They boycott Israel, but they refused to boycott ISIS. That tells you everything you want to know about the BDS movement. They condemn Israel and do not condemn ISIS; they condemn themselves. »
« Israel is an exemplary democracy » , « Netanyahu said. «We have academic freedom, liberty, rights of man of the press. » ISIS tramples the rights of man in the dust. It burned people alive in cages and groups of national students in Britain refuse to boycott ISIS and boycotted Israel. » $3/3
Read more Executive Committee of the National Union of the students of votes to boycott Israeli goods
The NUS – one amendment of an original motion entitled » » Solidarity with Palestin « e ‘-was adopted Tuesday by 19 votes for, 14 against and one abstention by the national Executive Committee elected Union.
Solidarity with the movement of Palestine is designed to put economic pressure on Israel to change its policy and recognize its actions in the Gaza Strip.
During the summer 2014, edge of protection of Israel operation resulted in the deaths of more than 2,000 Palestinians.
The previous year, however, the NUS decided not to boycott the Islamic State on fears that it would arise from Islamophobia.
After the vote, the Union of Jewish students accused the NUS NEC’s ‘political games’ and does not connect with students from the universities to engage properly with the issue.
» » Once more, the NUS NEC have adopted a policy supporting the boycott divestment sanctions (BDS) movement. This is the second time in less than a year that this debate has been had. « The motion adopted by 19 votes for, 14 against and one abstention, after a heated debate, » the Union of Jewish students said in a statement.
» » Those in support of the BDS movement want to believe that they target individuals to the public. « Their actions and the language regularly prove themselves as toxic forces on our campus and in our society. »
However, the BDS movement in response said student aid was the importance.
«Support the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement is one of the most important steps that unions of students internationally can take to demonstrate their solidarity with our struggle for freedom, justice and equality» the BDS site reads.
The group added that the level of support for the BDS in the United Kingdom was ‘comforting’.