le 19052015C E

Hi all

All accidents of trains in the USA in Philadelphia, among other 5 dead, fights of bikers, making 9 died in waco, TEXAS(c’est pas là,ou,il y a G.W.BUSH,àle texas) USA , the uprooting of plants dan nurseries, or, dansles parks, destruction of rare plants, see not found, FRANCE hospitalized poisoning by: Victorino Chua in Stepping Hill Hospital in Stockport in England, I guess, that’s a zazard also, it is, as the identity card of one of the drivers, or, one of the terrorists, is posed by slips on a bunch of gravat after the attacks of 9/11,

I believe in a thing, whatever you do, and although you say, the outcome will be the same.

Train accident « Everything went well, and suddenly we are overthrown, told a traveler  »

The FBI said participate in the survey would like, Hey, why men Rothschild rodent in the corner?

Bosses at French giant Societe Generale Bank were aware of the activities of « rogue trader » Jérôme Kerviel, a top detective working on the case reportedly told an investigating judge, according to Mediapart.

The French site of inquiry cited Nathalie Le Roy as saying judge Roger Le Loire, she was « certain » that Kerviel’s superiors « could not ignore » that he was taking very risky derivatives bets.

I’m MDR, they wanted to replace the cutlery, with J.KERVIEL, they have had it in the ass (in the butt) because they could not be foreign decisions, that they took themselves, JK did that obey crap decisions, that have sealed the General society, and they have appropriate blaming of their incompetence in J.K , but this is against, I do not know if remains the call

But, they can appeal, or called counsel for PISTORIUS, this will be the same, the facts are there

The fortune accumulated by the bangsters is the biggest scam ever put in place, the pyramid scheme of exploitation of the most monstrous population which has never been engineered

Disappeared, vanished into thin air, more no trace of what represents additional debt $ 30 000 per US $ 9 000 billion citizen either, 9 trillion in French, or 9 trillion in US standard or even $9 000 000 000 000 (in figures it spoke immediately more) the equivalent of 30 000 dollars for every American or more seriously $ 1,500 for each inhabitant of the planet (knowing that many of them earn no more $1 per day), four times what the USA Treasury owes to China. This is 100 000 euros for each French, here is the sad result of the flight of the FED mentioned above to discover the pot aux roses and amazement: Silence in the media (since May 6, 2009). Yet there was a Hay of the devil in the Kerviel case: 5 billion, or recently l’affaire Madoff: 50 billion. With regard to the whopping, really small players

The history of the « money changers ».

By Andrew Hitchcock, February 26, 2006.

Andrew also wrote the scenario of Rothschild and the Synagogue of Satan .

Please go here if you prefer a version only not shown, text of this essay.

Economists continually try and sell to the public the idea that recessions or depressions are naturally part of what they call the ‘situation ‘.

This timeline below will prove this is not the case. Recessions and depressions occur because central bankers manipulate the money supply, to ensure more and more in their hands and less and less is the hands of the people. AND Navy still had reason, Bill Rothschild 1973

Central bankers is developed from money changers and it is with these people we look for history in 48 B.C. below.

48 BC.

Julius Caesar

Jules César has resumed since the money changers, the power to coin money and then minted coins for the benefit of all. With this new, abundant money supply, it has created many massive construction projects and built major public works. Make abundant money, César won the love of the common people.

But the money changers hated him for it and that is why César was assassinated. Immediately after his assassination came the disappearance of money abundant in Rome, taxes increased, such as corruption.

Finally, Roman money supply was reduced by 90%, which resulted in people losing their land and their homes.

30 A.D.

Jesus Christ

Jésus Christ in the last year of his life uses physical force to throw the money changers out the temple. This is the only time during the life of his Ministry which he used physical force against anyone.

When the Jews came to Jerusalem to pay their Temple tax, they could only pay with a special coin, the half shekel. It was a half-ounce of pure silver, the size of a quarter. It was the only coin at the time which was pure silver and assured weight, without the image of a pagan emperor, and therefore to the Jews, it was the only nice part to God.

Unfortunately, these parts were not plentiful, the money changers had cornered the market on them, and so they have raised the price of them for whatever the market could bear. They used their monopoly they had on these parts to make exorbitant profits, forcing the Jews to pay whatever these money changers required.

Jesus threw the money as their monopoly on these parts changers totally violated the sanctity of the House of God. These claimed money changers died days later.

1024

The money changers had control of the monetary mass of medieval England and at this time were generally known as goldsmiths. Paper money began and it was simply a receipt you get after having deposited gold with a goldsmith, in their rooms without danger or vaults. This article started to be transferred because he was much more practice that carrying around lots of gold heavy and coins money.

Over time, to simplify the process, revenues were made the wearer rather than to the individual applicant, making it easily transferable without the need of a signature. This, also, broke the tie to any identifiable deposit of gold.

Finally the Goldsmith acknowledged that only a fraction of the applicants never came and demanded their gold at a given time, while they discovered how they could cheat on the system. They have started issuing receipts more they had gold to back up those receipts and no one would be all the wiser. They loan to these recipes that were not supported by the gold medal they had in their depositories and collect interest on them.

It is the birth of the system we know today as the fractional reserve Bankand as this system today, that meant the goldsmiths were able to make astronomical sums in loans, which was essentially fraudulent receipts, as they were for the gold, that Goldsmith did not yet possess. As they are gradually more confident that they would be ready up to 10 times the amount they had in their deposits.

To simplify how they made money on it, let’s give an example in which a fresh Goldsmith the same rate of interest to creditors and debtors. In this example, a goldsmith would pay interest of 6% on the gold that you had deposited with them and then charge interest of 6% on the money, I want to say fraudulent receipts, you borrowed from them. As they lend on ten times what you had deposited with them, while they you are paying 6% interest, they make 60% of the shares. It’s on your gold.

Goldsmith also discovered that their control of the monetary mass fraudulent gave them control over the economy and property of the people. They demanded their control by rowing the economy between easy and silver money tight.

The way they’ve done this should be easy to borrow money and therefore increase the amount of currency in circulation, then suddenly tighten money supply, out of traffic by making it harder to get loans or stopping offering them altogether.

Why have they done this? Simple, because the result would be a certain percentage of the population being unable to repay previous loans and did not not the possibility to purchase new, then they would have gone bankrupt and forced to sell their assets to the goldsmiths for literally pennies on the dollar.

This is exactly what is happening in the global economy of today, but it is called with words like, ‘the situation’, ‘expansion and slowdown,’ « recession » and « depression » in order to confuse the population of changers of money scam.

1100

King Henri I

King Henri I King William II succeeded to the throne of England. During his reign, he decided to take the power, the money changers had over the people, and did it by creating a completely new form of money that took the form of a stick! This stick was called, a « talley stick » and ended up being the longest lasting form of currency, lasting 726 years until in 1826 (even if other currencies came and went in the same period and ran alongside the talley sticks).

The talley stick was a polished wood stick in which notches were cut along one side, to indicate the name of represented the silver stick. The stick is then split longitudinally through the notches, so that the two pieces have a record of the notches. The King has kept a half to protect against counterfeiting and the other half was devoted to the economy and circulated as money.

It was also one of the most successful money systems in history, that the King demanded that the King taxes should be paid in, « sticks talley, » so this increases their circulation and their acceptance as a legitimate money. This system would work well in keeping energy far changers of money in England.

1225

Saint Thomas Aquinas

St. Thomas Aquinas was born, the first theologian of the Catholic Church which argued that the charging of interest is wrong because it applies to « double charging », charging for the money and the use of money.

This concept followed the teachings of Aristotle, who taught that the money was intended to serve the members of society and to facilitate the exchange of goods required to lead a virtuous life. Interest was contrary to reason and justice because it put an unnecessary burden on the use of the money.

Thus, law of the Church in Europe from the middle age prohibits the charging of interest on loans and even made a crime called « wear and tear « .. »

1509

King Henry VIII

The King Henry VIII succeeds King Henry VII on the throne in England. During his reign he has relaxed the laws regarding usury, and and the money changers do not lose time in re – assert themselves on the population. They quickly made their gold and silver system plentiful again. It is interesting to note that, under King Henry VIII, the Church of England separated from Roman Catholicism, whose Church law prevented the charging of interest on money.

1553

Queen Mary I have

Queen Mary I succeeds Lady Jane Grey nine day reign on the throne in England. During his reign, Queen Mary I, a devout Catholic, tightened the laws again wear. The money changers were not amused and in revenge they tightened the money supply by hoarding the coins of gold and silver and causing the economy to plummet.

1558

Queen Elizabeth I

Queen Elizabeth I succeeds Queen Mary I, her half-sister, on the throne in England. During her reign, Queen Elizabeth, I decided that in order to wrest control of the money supply, it would have to issue its own coins in gold and silver. It has done so by the public Treasury and successfully took control of the money supply since the money changers.

1609

Establish the changers of money in the Netherlands the first Central Bank in history, in Amsterdam.

1642

Oliver Cromwell

Oliver Cromwell is funded by the money changers to foment a revolution in England and allowing them to regain control of the money system. After much bloodshed, Cromwell finally purges Parliament, overthrows King Charles I and puts to death in 1649.

The money changers immediately consolidate their power and in the coming decades plunge Great Britain into a costly series of wars. They are also more than a square mile of property in Central London, which became known as the city of London.

1688

William of Orange

Changers of money in England following a series of quarrels with the Stuart Kings, Charles II (1660-1685) and James II (1685-1688), conspire with their money much more successful in changing the counterparts in the Netherlands, which had already set up a Central Bank it.

They decide to finance an invasion William of Orange of the Netherlands which they explore and implement will be more favourable for them. The invasion is successful and William of Orange came to the throne in England as King William III in 1689.

1694

The Charter of the Bank of England (1694)

After a costly series of wars over the past 50 years, french government officials go, hat in hand, to the money changers for the necessary loans further their political ends. The money changers are committed to resolve this problem in Exchange for a Government sanctioned privately owned bank which could issue money created from nothing.

This has been falsely called the, « Bank of England, » with the sole purpose to fool the general public into believing that he was part of the Government, which was not.

Like any other private company the Bank of England sold the shares to start. Private investors, whose names were never have been revealed, were supposed to put up £1 250 000 in gold coins to buy their shares in the Bank, but only £750 000 was never received. Despite this, the Bank has been duly approved and began to lend several times the money he supposedly had in reserves, any interest.

William Paterson

Although investors of the Bank of England have never revealed, one of the directors, William Paterson, said:

« The Bank is provision of interest on any money that it creates from nothing. »

The Bank of England would also be ready officials as much of the new currency they wanted, as long as they guaranteed debt by direct taxation of the British people. The Bank of England has amounted to nothing less that legal counterfeiting of national currency for a personal benefit, and therefore any country that would fall under the control of a private bank would amount to nothing more than a plutocracy.

Shortly after the Bank of England was formed he attacked the talley stick system, as was the money outside the power of money, as King Henri changers, I intend to make it.

1698

After four years of the Bank of England, their plan to control the money supply came in leaps. They have flooded the country with so much money that the public debt of the Bank reached the initial £1 250 000, £16 000 000, in just four years. This is an increase of 1 280%.

Why do they do it? Simple, if the money in circulation in a country is £5 000 000, and a Central Bank is implemented and print a further £15 000 000, first stage of the plan, it sends to the economy through loans etc, this will reduce the value of the initial £5 000 000 in circulation before the Bank was formed. This is because the initial £5 000 000 is now only 25% of the economy. It will also give the control of the Bank of 75% of the money in circulation with the £15 000 000 they sent in the economy.

This also causes inflation, which is the reduction in value of money supported by the common person, because the economy is flooded with too much money, an economy which the Central Bank are responsible. As money from the municipality of the person is worth less, he must go to the Bank to get a loan to help run its business, etc., and when the Central Bank are satisfied there is enough people with debt out there, the Bank will tighten the supply of money by offering does not ready. It is the second stage of the plan.

Third stage, sits at the bottom and waiting for the debtors to them to go bankrupt, allowing the Bank to then seize their real wealth, businesses and property, etc., for pennies on the dollar. The effects of inflation never a Central Bank, in fact, they are the only group that can benefit from, as if they were never short of money, they can just print more.

1757

Benjamin Franklin went to England and they spend the next 18 years of his life before the beginning of the American revolution.

1760

Mayer Amschel Rothschild

Mayer Amschel Bauer him change the name of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and sets up the House of Rothschild, who learns quickly if loans he money to Governments and royalties, then it is much more cost-effective than of a personal loan. This is because the loans are larger and supported by the taxes of their nations. He trains his five sons in the art of money creation.

1764

Benjamin Franklin

Benjamin Franklin is asked by officials of the Bank of England to explain the prosperity of the colonies in America. He responds:

« It’s simple. In the Colonies, we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. Will deliver us in proportion appropriate to the requirements of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from producers to consumers. In this way create for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay anyone. »

As a result of the declaration of Franklin, the British Parliament quickly adopted the 1764 currency Act. This prohibited colonial officials to issue their money and ordered them to pay all future taxes in gold or silver coins. Referring to the after the adoption of this law, Franklin would clarify the following in his autobiography,.

« In a year, conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression installed, to such point that the streets of the colonies were filled with unemployed… The colonies would gladly have brought the little tax on tea and other issues if it was that England won the colonies their money which created unemployment and discontent.

The viability of the colonists to get the power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of King George III and the international bankers was the main reason for the war of independence. »

Control of the system of American money will change hands 8 times since 1764.

1775

On 19 April, beginning of the war of independence in Lexington, Massachusetts. At this time the colonies had been drained of gold and silver as a result of British taxation. Accordingly, the continental Government could just print money to finance the war.

At the beginning of the revolution, the American money supply stood at $12 000 000. At the end of the war, it was nearly $500 000 000 and therefore the currency was virtually worthless. An example of this is that a pair of shoes now sold for $ 5 million. It also shows the danger of printing too much money. The reason Colonial scrip had worked was just enough was used to facilitate trade.

1781

Robert Morris

Towards the end of the American revolution, the Continental Congress was in desperate need of money, so they allowed Robert Morris, its Chief Financial Officer, to open a central private bank, in the hope that it could solve the problem of money.

Morris was a rich man who had grown richer during the revolution with the trade of war materiel. This first Central Bank in America was called Bank of North America, which has been set up with a Charter of four years and was closely modeled after the Bank of England. Allowed to practice the fraudulent system of fractional reserve banking, so it could create money it doesn’t have, then charge interest thereon.

Charter of the Bank, called for private investors to put up $400 000 of initial capital, which Morris found himself unable to raise. Nevertheless, it has shamelessly used his political influence to have gold deposited in the Bank, which had lent to the United States by the France. Morris then loaned the money should buy this Bank of this deposit of gold that belonged to the Government, or rather the American people.

This Bank of North America, again falsely named if the ordinary mortals would believe that it is under the control of the Government, was given a monopoly of the national currency.

1785

William Findlay

Despite the promises of Robert Morris that its ownership of the Bank of North America would solve the problem with the money supply, of course the economy continued to fall, forcing the Continental Congress not to renew the Charter of the Bank. The leader of the effort to kill this Bank was William Findlay of Pennsylvania, who said:

« This institution, having no principle but that greed, will never vary in its mission… are monopolize them the wealth, power and influence of the State. »

Mayer Amschel Rothschild moves his home to a five storey house in Frankfurt, Germany, which he shared with the Schiff family, (a descendant of Rothschild and Schiff, Jacob Schiff, who was born in this House, some 128 years later, would be instrumental in the establishment of the federal reserve).

1787

The Constitution

The colonial leaders assemble in Philadelphia to replace the Articles of Confederation by the Constitution. Governor Morris led the final draft of the Constitution, and he knew that the motivation of the bankers as he had already worked for them. Gouverneur Morris as well as his former boss, Robert Morris, and Alexander Hamilton had presented the original plan for the Bank of North America to the Continental Congress, in the last year of the revolution.

Fortunately, Governor Morris, at that time had discovered his conscience, Robert Morris, deserted and he said in a letter to James Madison dated July 2 this year.

« The rich will endeavour to establish their dominion and enslave the rest. They have always done. They will always be… They will have the same effect here as elsewhere, if not, by the power of the Government, keep us them in their appropriate spheres. »
Governor Morris

James Madison was opposed to a central private bank after seeing the exploitation of the people by the Bank of England. Thomas Jefferson was also against it, and later, Jefferson made the following statement,

« If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. »

Unfortunately, the words of wisdom of the Governor Morris and Thomas Jefferson fell on the deaf ears. Alexander Hamilton, Robert Morris and Thomas willing, convinced the most deputies of the constituent Assembly, not to give Congress the power to emit paper money.

James Madison

They did not know that most of these delegates was still reeling from the wild inflation of the currency of paper during the revolution. Also, these delegates have short memories and remember how Colonial Scrip had worked before the war, or the words of Benjamin Franklin’s wisdom in 1764.

Thus, the Constitution is silent on the issue of paper money by the Government to the citizens, leaving a wide open door for the money changers in the future.

1790

Less than 3 years after the Constitution was signed, newly-appointed first Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, proposed a Bill to the Congress for a new private Central Bank. Interestingly, first use of Alexander Hamilton after graduating from the Faculty of law in 1782 was as an aid to Robert Morris, a man to whom he had written in 1781 stating: « a national debt if not excessive will be to us a national blessing. »

1791

Alexander Hamilton

The three main actors behind the Bank Of North America were: Robert Morris; Alexander Hamilton; and the President of the Bank, Thomas willing. These men were not released, and Alexander Hamilton, now Secretary of the Treasury, a man who described Robert Morris that his ‘mentor’, managed to get a new Central Bank closed by the new Congress.

This new Bank was called the, « First Bank of the United States, » and was exactly the same as the Bank of North America. Robert Morris controlled, willing Thomas was president of the Bank, only the name has changed.

This Bank was established after a year of intense debate and was given a 20 year Charter. He was given a monopoly on the printing of currency of the United States even if 80% of its stock held by private investors. The other 20% was purchased by the Government of the United States, but this should not give it a piece if the action, but to provide the capital for investors private to buy the other 80%.
Thomas willing

As with the Bank of England and the old Bank of North America, private these investors never paid the full amount agreed for their actions. What is arrived, it was through fraudulent system of fractional reserve banking, the participation of 20% by the Government, which was $2 000 000 in cash, has been used to make loans to its private investors to purchase the other 80% of the capital, £8 000 000 for this risk free investment.

Once again as the Bank of England and the old Bank of North America, the name, the « First Bank of the United States », was deliberately chosen to hide from the common people that it was private property. The names of investors in this Bank were never revealed, although it is now widely accepted that the Rothschilds were behind it.

Interestingly in 1790 when Alexander Hamilton proposed this bank in Congress, Mayer Amschel Rothschild made the following statement of his bank in Frankfurt (Germany)

«Let me issue and control the money of a nation and I do not care who writes the laws.»

1796

The First Bank of the United States has been controlling the American money supply for 5 years. Meanwhile, the U.S. Government has borrowed $8 200 000 from this Central Bank, and in the country, prices have risen by 72%. In regards to this, Thomas Jefferson, then Secretary of State said:

« I wish it was possible to obtain a single amendment to our constitution taking the federal Government of their borrowing power.  »

1798

Mayer Amschel Rothschild sends his son, Nathan, at the age of 21, in England with a sum of money equivalent to £20 000, to set up a money changers.

1800

Napoleon

In France, the Bank of France has been implemented. However, Napoleon decided France had to break free of debt and he therefore never trusted this bank. He said that, when a Government is dependent upon bankers for money, it is bankers and not the heads of Government who are in control. He said,

« The hand that gives is above the hand that takes. « Money has no motherland, financial are without patriotism and without decency, their sole purpose is gain ».

1803

Thomas Jefferson

Now President Thomas Jefferson, President Jefferson signed an agreement with Napoleon in France. The United States would give Napoleon $ 3 000 000 Gold in Exchange for a huge chunk of territory west of the Mississippi. This is what is called the Louisiana Purchase.

Napoleon used this gold to set up an army. He then used this army of trigger across Europe where he began to conquer everything in its path. Quickly, the Bank of England increased to oppose Napoleon and financed every nation on his way, as usual, profiteering from war. Prussia, the Austria, and finally the Russia all then heavily into debt in a vain attempt to stop Napoleon.

1807

Duke of Wellington

30 years old Nathan Rothschild, head of the English branch of the family in London, personally supports a plan to smuggle a needed shipment of gold through the France to the Spain to finance an attack by the Duke of Wellington against Napoleon, from there.

1811

$

Nathan Rothschild

A Bill was put before the Congress to renew the Charter of the First Bank of the United States. The legislatures of Pennsylvania and Virginia pass resolutions asking Congress to kill the Bank. The national press openly attack the Bank calling it: a great scam. a vulture; a Viper; and a cobra.

Nathan Rothschild gets on the law and makes the following revealing statement about who was really behind the First Bank of the United States,

« The application for the renewal of the Charter is issued, or in the United States will find itself involved in a disastrous war more. »

George Clinton

When the smoke had cleared the Bill’s renewal has been authorized by one vote in the House and has been blocked in the Senate.

At this stage, fourth US president, president James Madison was in the White House. He was a fierce opponent of the Bank, and he sent his Vice President, George Clinton, to break the tie in the Senate, which killed the Bank.

1812

As promised by Nathan Rothschild, because the Charter for the First Bank of the United States is not renewed, thousands have to die and the British attack on America. However, as the British are still busy fighting Napoleon, they are incapable of mounting a large part of the assault and the war ended in 1814 with America undefeated.

1814

Attacks of Wellington South and other defeats eventually forced Napoleon to abdicate and Louis XVIII is crowned King. Napoleon is exiled to the tiny island of Elba, off the Italian coast.

1815

Napoleon escaped from his exile and returned to Paris. The French soldiers were sent to capture him, but he uses his charisma to convince these soldiers to rally around him, and they subsequently hail him as their emperor once more. In March, Napoleon meets an army that Duke of Wellington of England beats less than 90 days later at Waterloo.

Even if the result is predetermined, these bankers do not like to take any sort of risk, they are too used to a monopoly. Therefore Nathan Rothschild sent a trusted Messenger named Rothworth to Waterloo where he remained on the edge of the battlefield. Once the battle was decided, Rothworth took off for the channel and sent to the news of the victory of Wellington to Nathan Rothschild a full 24 hours before Wellington’s own mail.

Nathan Rothschild hurried to the London Stock Exchange and stood in his usual position. All eyes were on him as Rothschild had a legendary communications network. Rothschild was the desperate search and has suddenly started selling. Other traders believed that this meant that he had heard that Napoleon had won so they all started selling frantically.

The market subsequently fell, soon everyone was selling their consuls (British Government bonds), but then Rothschild secretly started it all through its agents on the ground, for a fraction of what they were worth a few hours only before purchasing. Many of these consuls were able to be converted into shares of Bank of England, which is how Rothschild took control of the Bank of England, and consequently, the British money supply.

Interestingly, 100 years later, the New York Times published an article claiming that grandson of Rothschild attempted to get a court order to remove a book with this, what we would today call « insiders » story inside. The Rothschild family, said the story was false and defamatory, but the Court rejected the request of the Rothschild family and ordered the family to pay all legal costs.

Nathan Rothschild openly boasting in his 17 years in England, it has increased its initial stake of £20 000 given to him by his father, 2500 times £ 50 000 000.

Some people wonder, why do bankers want war? Simple, bankers finance both sides in a war. They do this because the war is the largest generator of debt of all. A nation will borrow any amount for victory, even if banks have already predetermined the outcome. The ultimate loser is loaned just enough money to hold out a vain hope of victory and the final winner is given enough to ensure he wins.

How banks that they will get all their money back? Easy, these loans are granted on the guarantee that the winner will honour the debts of the vanquished. Regardless of the thousands of soldiers who give their lives under the pretext, it’s for the honor of their respective nations, when it is actually for the profits of bankers.

Indeed, during the period between the creation of the Bank of England in 1694 and the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo, this year, England had been at war for 56 years, with a large part of their time preparing for war. If it’s a good deal for the profits of the banks, then why change.

1816

Second Bank of the United States

The U.S. Congress passes a law allowing yet another privately owned Central Bank. This Bank has been called the « Second Bank of the United States » and the Charter was a copy of that of its predecessor, the First Bank of the United States. The Government of the United States would be once more expected to own 20% of the shares of the Bank.

Their share has been paid again at the front in the Bank and thanks to the fraudulent loans reserve fractional, it has been transformed into loans for private investors who bought again the remaining 80% of the shares. Just as before the names of these investors was kept secret.

1826

The talley stick is withdrawn from circulation in England.

1828

=

Andrew Jackson

After 12 years during which the Second Bank of the United States, handled shamelessly the U.S. economy at the expense of the people, but for the benefit of their own money grabbing ends, the American people had unsurprisingly enough. Opponents of this bank appointed Senator, Andrew Jackson , of Tennessee, to run for the Presidency.

To the chagrin of the money changers, Jackson won the Presidency and quite clear fact, that he had the intent to kill this bank at the earliest opportunity. He started during his first term in office, to eradicate the shores of many henchmen by his Government. To illustrate how deeply this cancer was rooted in Government, he fired to 2 000 11 000 employees of the federal Government.

1832

The Second Bank of the United States, ask the Congress to pass a renewal of the Charter of the Bank, four years earlier. Congress respected and sent the Bill to President Jackson for signing. The opposite President Jackson vetoed this Bill and in his veto message, he stated the following,

« It is not our only citizens who must receive the generosity of our Government. More than eight million of the stock of the Bank are held by foreigners… Did y at – it safe for freedom and independence in a bank which, in its nature, has so little to bind it to our country?

Controlling our currency, receiving our money public and holding thousands of our citizens in dependence… would be more formidable and dangerous than a military power of the enemy. If the Government will confine itself to equal protection and, as heaven does its rains, shower favor as well on the high and the low, the rich and the poor, it would be an unqualified blessing.

« In the Act before me it would seem to be broad and unnecessary departure from these few principles. »

In July, Congress failed to override the veto of President Jackson. President Jackson stood for re-election and for the first time in American history, he took his argument directly to the people by taking his re-election campaign on the road. His campaign slogan was,

«Jackson and no bank!»

Even if bankers paid more $3 000 000 opponent of President Jackson, the Republican, the campaign of Senator Henry Clays, President Jackson was re-elected by a landslide in November. President Jackson knew that the battle was only beginning however, and following his victory, he said.

« The Hydra of corruption is just stuck, not dead!

1833

Roger B. Taney

President Jackson appoints Roger b. Taney as Secretary of State for the Treasury, with instructions to remove deposits from the Second Bank of the United States Government. Previous two Secretaries of State of President Jackson to the Treasury, William J. Duane and Louis McLane had refused to comply with the request of President Jackson and were fired as a result.

However the head of the Second Bank of the United States, Nicholas Biddle, used his influence for the Senate to reject the nomination of Roger B. Taney and even threatened to cause a depression if the Bank is not redefined. Biddle said:

« This worthy president thinks that because he has scalped Indians and imprisoned judges, it must have its way with the Bank. He is wrong ».

Biddle went on to brazenly admit that the Bank intended to make rare money in order to force the hand of the Congress in re-Charter of the Bank. He said,

« Nothing else that widespread suffering will produce no effect on Congress… Our only safety continues a course of firm restriction – and I have no doubt that this path will lead eventually to the restoration of the currency and the new Charter of the Bank. »
Nicholas Biddle

That Biddle was with this statement, is to prove to the world that central banks were really about. He made good on his word and the Second Bank of the United States, strongly contracted the money supply by calling in old loans and refusing to issue new. Naturally, a financial panic ensued, followed by America being plunged into a deep depression.

Biddle then unashamedly blamed President Jackson for the accident, claiming that it was the withdrawal of Jackson of federal funds that had caused. This plunged crash of wages and prices, unemployment soared and bankruptcies of companies. The United States have been in uproar and editors blasted the President in editorials.

1835

Congress assembled what was called the, « panic Session », and on 27 March, President Jackson was officially censured by Congress to withdraw funds from the Bank of the second of the United States, in a vote which passed in the Senate by 26 to 20. It was the first time that a President had already been censured by Congress and Jackson said of the Bank,

« You are a den of vipers of thieves and I intend to rout on your, and by the Eternal God, I failed you.  »
George Wolf

However, the Governor of Pennsylvania, George Wolf, came out in support of President Jackson and strongly critical Bank. This, coupled with the fact that Nicholas Biddle was captured by offering to the public in terms of the Bank’s crash of the U.S. economy, caused a change in the opinion of the action of President Jackson.

In a full round of comments on 4 April, the House of representatives voted 134 to 82 against re-Charter of the Bank. This was followed by another strong vote that created a special Committee to examine whether the Bank had caused the crash.

However, when the Commission of inquiry arrived at the door of the Bank in Philadelphia with a summons to appear allowing them to inspect the books, Nicholas Biddle refused to renounce them, or allow the inspection of correspondence with members of Congress on their personal loans and the progress he had made for them. He also refused to testify before the Committee in Washington.

1836

The Charter for the Second Bank of the United States expires, and the Bank ceases to operate as a Central Bank of America. Nicholas Biddle was then arrested and charged with fraud. He was tried and acquitted, but died in 1844, still faced with civil suits.

1838

On 8 January the President Jackson is paying off the last installment of the national debt, which had been made necessary by allowing banks to issue currency Government bonds, rather than simply issuing Treasury this debt-free purchase. He was the only president to ever pay off the debt.
Richard Lawrence

January 30, an assassin called Richard Lawrence tried to shoot President Jackson, but both pistols misfired. Lawrence was later found not guilty for reason of insanity. However, after his release he boasted openly that powerful people in Europe had itself put up to the task and has promised to protect it if he had been captured.

When asked what his most important achievement had been alive, President Jackson stated without hesitation,

« I killed the Bank. »

Should the money changers 75 years to establish the next Central Bank, the federal reserve. This time, that they would take no chance and use one of them, Jacob Schiff, of the lineage of the Rothschilds, to undertake this.

1850

Jacob (James) Rothschild in France is supposed to be worth 600 million francs, which at the time was 150 million francs more than all that other bankers in France put in place.

1852

William Gladstone

Future British Prime Minister William Gladstone, stated the following about when he became Chancellor of the Exchequer this year.

‘As soon as I took office as Chancellor of the Exchequer, I started to learn that the State held, facing the Bank and the city, a position essentially untrue regarding finance. The Government itself should not be a power of background, but had to leave the power supreme and unquestioned. »

1861

Abraham Lincoln

A month after the inauguration of President Abraham Lincoln, the civil war has received being Fort Sumter, South Carolina, after South Carolina left the Union. Slavery has always been cited as being the cause of the war, but it was simply not the case, as president Lincoln himself said:

« I have no purpose directly or indirectly interfere with the institution of slavery in the State where it is now. I believe that I have no legal right to do so, and I have no desire to do so… My overriding objective is to save the Union, and it is not to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing a slave, I would do that. »

The real reason for the war, is that the southern States were in a dire economic situation due to the action of the Northern States. Northern industrialists had used trade tariffs to prevent the southern States to buy cheaper European products. Europe subsequently retaliated by stopping imports of cotton from the South. Thus the South were forced to pay more for goods with their reduced income.

Otto Von Bismarck

This is when the money changers saw the opportunity to divide and conquer America plunging into civil war. This is confirmed by Otto Von Bismarck , when he was Chancellor of Germany (1871-1890), who stated:

Force equal division of the United States of America in federations decided long before the civil war by the financial powers of Europe, these bankers were afraid that the United States if they remained as one block and as one nation, would achieve economic and financial independence which would upset their financial domination throughout the world. »

Only months after these first shots in South Carolina, ready central bankers, Napoléon III of France (the Napoleon of the battle of Waterloo nephew), 210 million francs to seize Mexico and then station troops along the southern border of the United States, taking advantage of the civil war to return the Mexico colonial domination.

Napoleon III

It was in violation of the « Monroe Doctrine » which was issued by president James Monroe during his seventh annual State of the Union to Congress in 1823. This doctrine proclaimed opinion in the United States that European powers should no longer colonize the Americas or interfere with the Affairs of the sovereign nations located in the Americas, as in the United States, the Mexico and others.

In return, the United States planned to stay neutral in wars between European and the wars between a European power and its colonies powers. However, if these latter type of wars should occur in the Americas, the United States would consider such action as hostile towards himself.

While the French were violating the, Monroe Doctrine in Mexico, the British followed suit by moving the 11 000 soldiers in the Canada and positioning along the northern border of America. President Lincoln knew he was in trouble, so he went with his Secretary to the Treasury, Salomon P. Chase, in New York to get the appropriations necessary to finance the defense of America.

The money changers had designed the war to make the Union fail, and were not on record now, so they offered loans at interest of 24% to 36%. President Lincoln refused because they knew that he and return to Washington, where he was sent for Colonel Dick Taylor of Chicago, who was responsible for the problem of how it should finance the war.

Dick Taylor

At a meeting president Lincoln asked Colonel Taylor what proposals it came with to finance the war. Colonel Taylor said:

« Why Lincoln, it’s easy, just get the Congress to pass a bill authorizing the printing of the complete legal Treasury notes… and pay your soldiers with them and go ahead and win your war with them also. »

President Lincoln asked Colonel Taylor if the people of the United States would accept the notes, Colonel Taylor said,

« People or anyone else will not any choice in the matter, if you make them full legal tender. They will have the full sanction of the Government and be as good as any money, as the Congress is given that right expressly in the Constitution. »

1862

Green tickets

President Lincoln began the printing of the amount $450 000 value 000 of new bills. These bills were printed in green ink on the back, in order to distinguish them from other banknotes in circulation and have called them, « Greenbacks. » These have been printed at no interest to the federal Government and were used to pay the troops and purchase their supplies. President Lincoln would be the last president to issue debt free United States notes, and he said on this subject,

« The Government should create, issue and disseminate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. » The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is in the greatest opportunity of creation by the Government. The taxpayers will be saved by the adoption of these principles… immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity. »

In response to this statement, The Times of London published a piece of propaganda obviously made by bankers, containing the following statement,

« If this mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the Republic of North America, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will present its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to operate its business.

It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized Governments of the world. Intelligence and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That Government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe. »

1863

Bankers struck back. President Lincoln needing authority of Congress to issue more greenbacks, Lincoln was forced by letting the bankers to push them, « National Banking Act, » by Congress.

The most important part of this Act was that in future, the entire the United States money supply would be created debt by buying bonds of the United States national banks and their issuance of reservations for tickets. On top of this monopoly, the national banks were allowed to operate under a free virtual tax status. This type of bank scam is explained by the historian, Galbraith, who stated:

« For many years following the war, the federal Government ran a heavy surplus. She however could not pay its debt, remove its titles, because he wanted to say is there is no links back notes of the National Bank. To pay off the debt was to destroy the monetary mass. »
Tsar Alexander II

Later this year, Tsar Alexander II gave president Lincoln unexpected help. The issued orders Czar who so actively either England or the France intervened in the civil war and help the South, the Russia would consider this action a declaration of war. To show that it was not tinkering, he sent part of its Pacific fleet at the port of San Francisco.

It wasn’t because the Tsar was benevolent towards America instead that he was very intelligent. He, like Otto Von Bismarck in Germany, could clearly see that the money changers have been up to, indeed, he had already refused to let them set up a Central Bank in Russia.

He understood that if America were to come under the control of Britain or the France, then America would once more under the control of central bankers, and such an expansion of the empire of bankers, would mean that they would eventually threaten the Russia.

1864

Salomon P Chase

President Lincoln is re-elected on November 8 and November 21 that he wrote a friend,.

« The power of money feeds on nations in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. »

Salomon P Chase, now president Lincoln former Secretary of the Treasury, said:

« My agency in promoting the adoption of the National Bank Act was the greatest financial mistake in my life. It has built a monopoly which affects any interest in the country ».

1865

John Wilkes Booth

April 14, 41 days after his inauguration in second and just five days after general Lee surrendered to general Grant at Appomattox, president Lincoln is shot by John Wilkes Booth, at the Ford theatre. Later, he would die of his injuries. The allegations that the international bankers were responsible for the assassination of president Lincoln, would be taken to the Canadian House of the Commons, nearly 70 years later, in 1934.

The person who revealed this was a Canadian lawyer, Gerald G. McGeer. He had obtained evidence removed from the public record he provided by Agents of the secret service at the trial of John Wilkes Booth, after the death of Booth. McGeer said that it showed that John Wilkes Booth was a mercenary working for the international bankers. His speech would be reported in an article published in the Vancouver Sun dated dated 2 may 1934, where it says,

« Abraham Lincoln, the murdered emancipating slaves, was murdered by the machinations of a representative of the Group of International bankers, who feared the ambitions of national credit of the President of United States. » It there was only one group in the world at the time who had any reason to desire the death of Lincoln. « They were men who are opposed to his program of the national currency and who had fought throughout the entire civil war on its policy of greenback currency. »

Gerald G. McGeer also stated that the assassination of Lincoln was not simply because international bankers wanted to re-establish a Central Bank in America, but also because they wanted to establish currency of America on gold, that they were of course controlled. They wanted to put America on a gold standard. This is in direct opposition to the policy of president Lincoln to issue Green tickets, based solely on the good faith and credit of the United States.

The Vancouver Sun article also quoted Gerald G. McGeer with the following statement,

« They were men interested in the establishment of the gold standard and the right bankers to manage the currency and credit of all Nations of the world. With Lincoln Road, they were able to examine this project and has made it to the United States. Within 8 years after the assassination of Lincoln, silver was demonetized and put gold system in place in the United States. »

1866

European Central bankers wanted the re-establishment of a Central Bank under their control and a U.S. currency backed by gold. They chose gold as gold has always been relatively rare and therefore much easier to monopolize, that, for example, money, which was abundant in the United States and had been found in large quantities with the opening of the American West.

Thus, on 12 April, Congress returned to work at the tender of European Central bankers. It is passed the, « Contraction Act, » authorizing the Secretary of the Treasury to contract the money supply by removing some of the greenbacks in circulation.

This contraction of money and it’s disastrous results is explained by Theodore r. Thoren and Richard f. Walker, in their book, « The Truth in money book, » in which they state the following,.

« The difficult times which occurred after the civil war could have been avoided if the greenback legislation had continued as president Lincoln had planned. Instead, there were a series of money panics, what we call recessions, which put pressure on the Congress to pass a law to place the banking system under centralized control. Finally the federal reserve Act was adopted on December 23, 1913. »

This is how the « Contraction Act, » passed by the Congress affected America (the money supply goes down simply because currency in circulation is removed):

Year

In circulation

About per capita

1866

$1 800 000 000

$50.46

1867

$1,300,000,000

$44.00

1876

$ 600 000 000

$14.60

1886

$400 000 000

$6.67

That is why in the twenty years since 1866 two-thirds of the U.S. money supply had been called by bankers, representing a 760% loss in purchasing power this twenty years. Money has become rare, everything simply because Bank loans were called in and no new were given.

1872

Ernest Seyd is sent to America on a mission to the Rothschild owned bank of England. He received $100 000 which he is use to bribe members of Congress as necessary, for the purpose of obtaining silver demonetized, as found in huge quantities in the American West, which ate into profits of Rothschild.

1873

Ernest Seyd obviously spent his money wisely, as Congress pass the « Coinage Act » which translates the striking of silver being arrested suddenly dollars. In addition, representative Samuel Hooper, who introduced the Bill in the House, even admitted that Ernest Seyd had drafted in terms of the legislation.

1874

Ernest Seyd himself admitted who was behind the demonetizing of silver in America, when he made the following statement,

« I went in America during the winter of 1872-1873, authorized to establish, if I could, the passage of a Bill demonetizing silver. It was in the interest of those whom I represented, the Governors of the Bank of England, did. In 1873, gold coins were the only form of currency. »

1876

Due to manipulation of the money supply in America, one-third of the workforce is unemployed and disorders develops. There are even calls for a return to greenback money or money. For example, Congress creates the, « United States Silver Commission, » to investigate the problem.

This commission has understood that the national bankers were the cause of the problem, with their voluntary contraction of the money supply. An excerpt of their report reads as follows,

« The disaster of the dark ages was caused by the decline in money and lower prices… Without money, civilization could not have had a beginning, and with exhaustion, should mope and except if relieved, finally perish. At the Christian era, the coinage of the Roman Empire amounted to $1 800 000 000. At the end of the 15th century, it was reduced to less than $200 000 000… History records no other such disastrous transition as that of the Roman Empire in the age of darkness… »

Despite this damning report of the Committee, the Congress took no action.

1877

Riot erupts from Pittsburgh to Chicago. Bankers will meet to decide what to do and they decided to hang on, because they knew that despite the violence, they were now firmly in control. The meeting of the American Bankers Association, they urged their members to do everything in their power, to put an end to any notion of a return to the greenbacks.

The Secretary of the Association of American Bankers, James Buel, even wrote a letter to members in which he openly calls on the banks to the subversion of the Congress and the press. In that letter, he stated,

« It is advisable to do everything in your power to support these prominent dailies and weeklies, newspapers in particular agriculture and religious press, but also to oppose the greenback issue of paper money, and you will remember also the patronage of all applicants who are not willing to oppose the Government of money issue…

… To repeal the law on the creation of bank notes, or to restore the circulation issuing money will be to the people with money and will therefore seriously affect our individual profits as bankers and lenders. « See your representative in Congress at the same time and commit to supporting our interests we can control legislation. »

1878

James Buel letter clearly had some effect, although pressure has mounted in Congress to change, the press has tried to turn the general public from the truth. An example of this is the New York Tribune in its edition of January 10 in which it is stated in a bankers propaganda piece.

« The capital of the country is finally organized and we’ll see if Congress will dare to fly in his face. »

This early control of the media did not work entirely however, as February 28, Congress adopted the « Sherman Act ». This Act allowed the striking of a limited number of silver dollars, put an end to the 5-year break. However, this does not mean that all those who have contributed money to the United States Mint could hit him in dollars in money, free of charge, as in the period before Coinage Act of Ernest Seyd, in 1873. Or the support of the American currency also remained.

However, this Sherman law ensured that little money has started to flow into the economy, once again and coupled with the fact that bankers have now realized they were still firmly in control, they began issuing loans again and the post war civil depression was finally over.

1881

=)

James Garfield

Americans elect the Republican, James Garfield as the 20th President of the United States of America. It was a matter of concern for the money changers, because as a member of Congress, he was Chairman of the appropriations Committee and was a member of the Bank and currency. The money changers were therefore aware that President Garfield was in full knowledge of their scam on the American people. Indeed, after his inauguration, said President Garfield,

« He who controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce… « And when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you’ll not that be told how periods of inflation and depression originate. »

Curiously in the few weeks which made this declaration, President Garfield was assassinated on 2 July.

1891

The money changers spent the last decade creating economic booms followed by depressions, so that they could buy thousands of homes and farms for pennies on the dollar. They were preparing to take the economy down again in the near future and in a shocking note sent by the American Bankers Association, which would be released in the Congressional Record more than twenty years later, stated the following,

« September 1, 1894 we not renew our loans under any consideration. September 1, we will require our money.

Distract us and become mortgages in possession. We can take two-thirds of the farms West of the Mississippi River and thousands of them East of the Mississippi, at our own price… Then the farmers will become tenants as in England… »

1891 American Bankers Association, as printed in the Congressional Record of April 29, 1913.

1896

=

William Jennings Bryan

The central issue in the presidential campaign is the question of money more money. Senator William Jennings Bryan of Nebraska, a Democrat, only 36 years old, made an emotional speech to the National Convention democratic Chicago, entitled, « The Crown of thorns. » and gold cross Senator Bryan said:

« We will answer their demand of a gold standard by saying to them, you should not rely on the labor front this Crown of thorns, you shall not crucify mankind on a cross of gold. »

Bankers naturally supported the Republican candidate, William McKinley who in return favored the gold standard. In addition, those of the McKinley campaign, got manufacturers and industrialists to inform their employees that if Bryan were elected, all factories and plants would be closed and there would no work.

This tactic succeeded, McKinley beat Bryan, but by a small margin.

1898

==

Pope Léon XIII

Pope Leo XIII stated on the subject of usury,

« On the one hand, it is the party who holds the power because it holds wealth, which has at its fingertips, all work and all trade, which manipulates for its own benefit and for his own purposes, all sources of supply, and that is powerfully represented in the Councils of State itself. On the other side, there is the multitude of poor and powerless, painful and suffering.

Raptor wear, which, although more than once condemned by the Church, is nevertheless in a different form but with the same conviction, still practiced by grasping and greedy men… so a small number of very rich men have been able to throw on the masses of poor a yoke little better than slavery itself. »

1907

During the early 1900s, the money changers were anxious to advance their business of setting up of another Central Bank for America. Rothschild, Jacob Schiff, the head of Kuhn, Loeb and co., in a speech to the Chamber of Commerce of New York, said, or rather threatened,

« Unless we have a Central Bank with adequate control of credit resources, this country is going to undergo the most severe and deep panic of money in its history.  »
=

J. P. Morgan

They put Rothschild agent, Morgan at the forefront of their charge. Interestingly, the father of Morgan, Julius Morgan, had been financial agent of America to the British, and after the death of Julius, Morgan took a British partner, Edward Grenville, who was a longtime Director of the Bank of England.

This year has been the year of the money changers attack. J. secretly, P. Morgan and his acolytes crash the stock market. They were aware that thousands of small banks were much more extensive, some had only a provision of 1% under the fraudulent fractional reserve principle. In just a few days, the Bank operates has become commonplace across the country.

Morgan then stepped up and publicly announced that he would support these failing banks. What he failed to mention, is that he would by the manufacture of money from nothing. And then what happened, surprise, surprise, Congress allow it to do so! Thus, Morgan manufactured $200 000 000 private money completely reserveless, purchased goods and services with it and some of them sent its branch banks to lend at interest.

Thus, the public took trust in money, but more importantly, it meant that the banking power was now more consolidated in the hands of a few large banks.

1908

=

Woodrow Wilson

With the financial panic widespread, Morgan was acclaimed as a hero by the President then Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson, which, even roughly or declared arrogantly

« All this trouble could be avoided if we appointed a Committee of six or seven men public spirited as Morgan, to manage the Affairs of our country. »

President Theodore Roosevelt had also signed into law, after the financial panic, a bill creating the « national monetary Commission. »

The commission was studying the banking problem and make recommendations to the Congress. Naturally, the commission was packed with friends and buddies of Morgan.

Nelson Aldrich

The President was Senator Nelson Aldrich of Rhode Island, and he represented homes Newport Rhode Island’s richest banking families of America. His daughter married John, and together they had five sons (including Nelson who became Vice President in 1974 and David who would become the head of the Council on foreign relations).

Following the establishment of the national monetary Commission, Senator Aldrich immediately started a tour of conclusion 2 years made of Europe, where he consulted extensively with central bankers deprived in England, France and Germany, or rather Rothschild, Rothschild and Rothschild.

The total cost of this trip of 2 years for the American taxpayer? $300 000. Yes, three hundred thousand dollars, which is not a typo!

1910
Jekyll Island

Senator Aldrich returns from its two-year European fact fact-finding mission on 22 November. Shortly after some of private cars more wealthy and powerful men boarded Senator Aldrich of America in strict secret. They spent at Jekyll Island , off the coast of the Georgia coast.
Paul Warburg

In this group were Paul Warburg, who earned a $500 000 farm, belonging to a salary for year of Rothschild Kuhn, Loeb & Company. This salary was for him to push for a Central Bank in America. Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild who had purchased Kuhn, Loeb and Company, soon after his arrival in America, England, was also present.

The Rothschilds, the Warburgs and Schiffs, interconnected by marriage, were essentially of the same family.

Secret at this meeting was so tight that all participants were warned to use only first names, to prevent the servants to learn their identities. Years later, one of the participants, Frank Vanderlip, President of national Citibank and a representative of the Rockefeller family, confirmed the trip of the Jekyll Island in an edition of February 9, 1935, of the Saturday Evening Post in which he stated,

« I was in fact under the name secret, as furtive as any conspirator… Discovery, we knew this, must be simply not, or all our time and effort would be lost. If it were to be exposed that our group had gathered and written a Banking Bill, this Bill would have no chance of passage by Congress.  »
Jacob Schiff

It was not just the setting up of a Central Bank that has been the order of the day. Other problems for these bankers were that the market share of these banks national decreased rapidly. In the first ten years of the century, the number of banks of the United States had more than doubled to more than 20 000. In 1913, only 29% of all banks were banks and they held only 57% of all deposits. Like John d. Rockefeller said.

« Competition is SIN!

Senator Aldrich later admitted in a magazine article,

« Before the adoption of this Act, the bankers of New York could dominate only reserves of New York. Now we are able to dominate the reserves of the Bank of the whole of the country. »
Frank Vanderlip

If one of the objectives of these conspirators to bring these new banks under their control. Second, the economy of the nations was so strong that companies have started to finance their own developments on profits instead of taking huge loans from the banks. Indeed, in the first ten years of the century, 70% of finance companies came from profits.

Basically, the American became independent of the money changers, and the money changers were not about to let that happen.

There was also much discussion about the name of the new Bank, which took place in a conference room at the Jekyll Island Club Hotel. Aldrich believes the word, ‘Bank’,’ should not even appear in the name. Warburg wanted to call the legislation, « Bill national reserve’ or, ‘the federal reserve Bill ».  » The idea was not only to give the impression that the new Central Bank was intended to stop bank runs, but also to hide his nature of monopoly.

However, it was Senator Aldrich, the ebong, who insisted, he would call the, « Aldrich Bill. » So, after nine days at Jekyll Island, the group dispersed. This group of conspirators put immediately in place an education fund of $5 000 000 for the finance professors at top universities to approve the new Bank.

The new Central Bank would be very similar to the old Bank Of The United States, because it would give a monopoly on the motto of the United States and create money from nothing. Also, in order to make the public believe that it was under the control of the Government, the plan called for the Central Bank, which will be managed by a Board of directors appointed by the President and approved by the Senate.

This would be no problem to undue for bankers, because they knew, they could use their money to buy influence on politicians, to ensure that the men they wanted got appointed to the Board of Governors.

1912

Lindbergh

The Aldrich Bill is presented to the Congress for debate. This was very quickly identified as a bill for the benefit of bankers or an expression for them, which was invented at the time, « money trust. » During the debate, the Republican, Lindbergh said.

« The Aldrich plan is the Wall Street Plan. This means another panic, if necessary, to intimidate the people. Aldrich, paid by the Government to represent the people, proposes a plan for the trusts instead. »

This debate continued on, the bankers realized they did not have enough support, so branch Republican has never brought the Aldrich Bill to a vote. Instead the bankers decided to move their attention to the Democrats and started heavily financing Woodrow Wilson, the Democratic candidate. The Wall Street banker, Bernard Baruch, was placed charge of Bill Wilson and as a historian, James Perloff, stated:

«Baruch put Wilson for the headquarters of the Democratic Party in New York in 1912, « main him like a wood a poodle on a chain.» Wilson received a ‘race indoctrination,’ leaders convened it y…  »

Bernard Baruch

During the Democratic presidential campaign, Wilson and leaders of the Democratic Party pretended to oppose the Aldrich Bill. As long as Republican representative, Louis t. McFadden, explained twenty years later, while he was was Chairman of the Standing Committee on banking and currency,

« The Aldrich Bill was condemned in the platform… When Woodrow Wilson has been appointed… The men who ruled the Democratic party promised the people that if they were returned to power is there is no Central Bank established here while they held the reins of Government.

Thirteen months later that promise was broken, and the Wilson administration, under the tutelage of those sinister figures of Wall Street who stood behind Colonel House, established here in our free country of the monarchic institution wormy from la, ‘Bank of the King’ to dominate us from the top to the bottom and we the rollbar from the cradle to the grave. »

On 5 November, Woodrow Wilson was elected, and Morgan, Paul Warburg, Bernard Baruch et al, advanced a new plan which Warburg called the federal reserve system. The direction of the Democratic Party welcomed the new bill called the, « glass-Owen Bill, » as long as it is totally different to the Aldrich Bill, when he was indeed virtually identical.

Louis T. McFadden

Oddly enough, the Democrats were so vehement in their denial of the similarity of the, « glass-Owen Act project, «law» Bill Aldrich, as Paul Warburg, the creator of these two bills, was supposed to inform his friends paid to the Congress, that the two bills were virtually identical and that is why they must vote to pass. Warburg said:

« Excluding external differences affecting, ‘shells’, we find, »grain, »the two systems very closely resembling and related to another. »

However, this admission by Warburg was not made public. Instead, Senator Aldrich and Frank Vanderlip, National Citibank in New York, the President of Rockefeller were to publicly state their opposition to the Bill in order to believe that the proposed Bill differed radically the Aldrich Bill. Indeed, Frank Vanderlip stated years later in the Saturday Evening Post,

« Although the Aldrich federal reserve Plan was defeated when it bore the name Aldrich, nevertheless its essential points were all contained in the plan finally adopted. »

1913

With Congress nearing a vote on the glass-Owen Bill, they called the Attorney of Ohio, Alfred Crozier, to testify. However, Crozier noticed the similarities between the Aldrich Bill and subsequently declared and glass-Owen Bill,.

« The… Bill grants just what Wall Street and the big banks for twenty-five years have been striving to – private instead of public scrutiny of the currency. » It (the Bill’s glass-Owen) is as completely as the Aldrich Bill. Both measures rob the Government and the people of any effective control over public funds and shall be vested in the banks exclusively the power dangerous to make money in lean people, or many. »

The debate on this Bill was not well for the banks, with many senators notifying her that the Bill was corrupt and deceitful, however Bill was approved by the Senate on December 22. How did this happen? Because most of the Senators had left the city to return home for the Christmas holidays. In addition, these Senators had been assured by branch, that nothing would be done about this Bill until long after the Christmas holidays.

Representative Charles A Lindbergh SR. has said,

« This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on Earth. When the President signs this Bill, the invisible Government of the monetary power will be legalized. People know perhaps immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed… The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this Bank and currency Bill. »

Interestingly, only a few weeks earlier, in October, Congress finally passed a Bill legalizing direct income the people tax. This was in the form of a bill passed by Senator Aldrich, who is now known as Amendment No 16. The income tax act has been fundamental to the federal reserve. This is because the federal reserve is a system that would go towards the top, essentially, an unlimited federal debt.

The only way to guarantee the payment of interest on this debt was to directly tax the people, as they had done with the Bank of England. If the federal reserve had to rely on contributions from the States, they would be dealing with larger entities, who might rebel and refuse to pay the interest on their own money, or at least push policy in order to maintain the reduced debt.

In fact, the 16th amendment was never ratifiedand therefore many American citizens do not pay their taxes, and there is nothing that the Government of the United States can do about it. For more information on this, go to thelawthatneverwas.com. Also, in 1895, the supreme court had also found a law similar to Amendment 16-income tax, as unconstitutional. The supreme court also found unconstitutional a corporate tax law in 1909.

Another important amendment that was put through this year is Amendment No 17. This provided the direct election by the people of two senators from each State, and oppose the original system to have the State legislatures to elect senators. More democratic, one might think, until what you realize these bankers could now provide funds for their people to run for the Senate’s hand picked and avoid future problems, such as the federal reserve: alert to the Senate.

In any case, back to the federal reserve, if you have doubts as to whether the federal reserve is a private company, a basic check that the public can make is in their directory. Look in the pages of the Government and it is not listed, but you will find that it listed in the pages of the company.

In fact some recent data is proposed for what is actually owner of the federal reserve, and they are the following banks:
•The Rothschild Bank of London
•Warburg Bank of Hamburg
•Rothschild Bank of Berlin
•Lehman Brothers of New York
•Lazard brothers of Paris
•Kuhn Loeb Bank New York
•Israel Moses Seif banks of Italy
•Goldman, Sachs of New York
•Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
•Chase Manhattan Bank of New York

Also, some argue that the federal reserve is a quasi government agency, yet the President only 2 of the 7 members of the Board of Governors of the federal reserve, every four years, he named and them to 14-year term, which is much longer than any term that might possibly serve as president. The Senate confirms these appointments, but as we have seen, is the idea, because they are the hands of those chosen by bankers who also finance their campaigns, ensuring loyalty to them, not the people.

Let’s summarize how the federal reserve creates money from nothing. It is a four step process:
1.The Federal Open Market Committee approves the purchase of bonds in the United States*.
2.The links are purchased by the federal reserve.
3.The federal reserve pays for these bonds, with electronic credit to seller’s Bank, these credits are based on nothing.
4.Banks use these deposits as reserves. They can lend more than ten times the amount of their reserves of new borrowers at interest.

* Bonds are simply promise to pay or recognition of government debt. People buy bonds in order to obtain a rate of interest. At the end of the term of the bond, the government repays the bond, plus interest and the connection is destroyed.

Let’s look at an example of how it works with a purchase of federal reserve $ 1 000 000 of bonds. Then gets transformed in addition to $10 000 000 in bank accounts. The federal reserve has in effect creates 10% of this amount totally new $ 10 000 000 and banks create the 90%.

To reduce the amount of currency in circulation, this process is simply reversed. The federal reserve sells these bonds to the public and money out of buyer’s Bank. Loans must be reduced by ten times the amount of the sale, so a sale of federal reserve $ 1,000,000 in bonds, translates into $10 000 000 less money in the economy. How does this benefit the bankers, whose representatives met at Jekyll Island?
1.It has prevented any future banking reform efforts, as the federal reserve was to be the sole producer of money.
2.This in turn prevented a free system of appropriate debt of public finances, as president Lincoln Greenbacks, making a comeback. Instead, the binding system based financial administration forced on Lincoln after that he created greenbacks, now engraved in stone.
3.It has delegated to the bankers the right to create 90% of our money supply based on a fraudulent system of fractional reserve Bank and allowed them to lend that 90% of the interest.
4.It centralized overall control of our nations money in the hands of and for the benefit of a few men.
5.It created a Central Bank with a high degree of independence of the effective political control.

1914

The beginning of the first world war. In this war, the German Rothschilds loaned money to the Germans, British ready money to the British Rothschilds and money loaned Rothschilds French for the French.

One year after the adoption of the federal reserve Act, representative Charles A Lindbergh SR., described how the Federal Reserve created, « situation » and how they handled that, to their own advantage. He said,

« Because of high prices, the Federal Reserve Board will do will be to reduce the rate of discount…, producing an expansion of credit and a rise in stock exchange, then when… businessmen are adapted to these conditions, it can check… prosperity in mid-career by arbitrarily raising the rate of interest. »

It can cause the pendulum of a market of fronts and falling to swing gently back and forth by slight changes in the discount rate, or cause violent fluctuations by a greater rate variation, and in both cases, it must possess inside information on financial conditions and advance knowledge of the change come upwards or downwards. It is the strongest and most dangerous advantage ever place into the hands of a particular class of privilege by a Government that ever existed.

The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of the money of others. They know in advance when to create panics to their advantage. They also know when to stop the panic. Inflation / deflation work equally well for them when they control finance. »

1915

J. P. Morgan became the selling agent for the, « Council of war material » both the British and the French in world war and becomes the biggest consumer in the world, spend 10 million dollars a day. In addition, president Woodrow Wilson appointed banker, Bernard Baruch, head of the « War Industries Board. »

According to the historian, James Perloff, Bernard Baruch both the Rockefellers profited by approximately 200 million dollars during the first world war.

Many people believe that the key to effective monetary mass is to make sure it is backed by something of value like gold. However, who do you think would control that gold? As a Republican, Lindbergh has declared this year.

« The federal reserve banks have already cornered gold and gold certificates. »

1916

President Wilson began to realize the seriousness of the damage he had done in America, freeing from the federal reserve on the American people. He said,

« We arrived to be one of the worst Mantua, one of the most completely controlled Governments in the civilized world – no longer a Government of free opinion, no longer a Government by… a vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men. »

Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. »

1917

Changers of money never forgave the Tsars of Russia for the two constantly oppose their request to put in place a Central Bank of Russia, as well as their support of president Lincoln during the civil war. As a result, Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild, spent 20 million dollars through his firm, Kuhn, Loeb & Co., in the financing of the Russian Revolution.

It is believed that Communism is the opposite of capitalism, so why these capitalists would support it? Respected researcher, Gary Allen, he explained as follows,

« If one understands that socialism is not a program of sharing wealth, but this is actually a method to consolidate and control the wealth, the apparent paradox of the super rich men promoting socialism would become so no paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logical, even the perfect tool to search for megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately socialism, is not a movement of the oppressed masses, but of the economic elite. »

1919

In January, the Paris Peace Conference is held after the end of the first world war. Bankers put world Government at the head of their priorities, and Paul Warburg and Bernard Baruch attend this conference with President Wilson. To the chagrin of the bankers, the world was not yet ready to dissolve national boundaries and accept World Government, so that part of his plan had failed.

The World Government plan was called the, « League of Nations » and although many nations accepted this proposal, the Congress of the United States would not, therefore support without the support of money from the Treasury of the United States, the bankers had failed and died of the League of Nations.

1920

Warren

Warren was elected President of the United States of America, succeeding Woodrow Wilson in 1921. This will be the start of a period known as, ‘roaring twenties ‘. Despite the fact that the world war had saddled America with a debt that was ten times greater than its civil war debt, the economy of the United States increased in abundance. Also, gold had paid in America during the war and continued during the 1920s.

The reason for this growth is that President Harding reduced taxes to the Canada and increased tariffs on imports to record levels.

1921

Thomas Edison

The inventor of the electric light, Thomas Edison, said in an article published in the New York Times, December 6,

« If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the good link, makes the Bill good, also… It is absurd to say that our country may issue 30 million in bonds and not 30 million dollars in currency. Both are promises to pay, but a promise fattens the usurers and the other helps the people. »

1922

Theodore Roosevelt

President Theodore Roosevelt , who died in 1919 was quoted in the March 27 edition of the New York Times with the following statement,

« These international bankers and Rockefeller Standard Oil interests control most of newspapers and the columns of these newspapers as well in club in the presentation or by car of public office officials who refuse to do the bidding of powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible Government ».
John hylan

The reason why the New York Times published this article, was due to the Mayor of New York, John hylan, who had been reported in the same paper the previous day, March 26, with the following statement,

« The warning of Theodore Roosevelt has much news today, for the real threat of our Republic is this invisible Government which like a giant octopus extends its slimy length over city, State and nation… » It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our leaders, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers and all the bodies for the protection of the public…

Depart from mere generalizations, let me say that at the head of this Octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. This little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States Government for their own selfish ends.

They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make cats Paws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations and use all devices layout appointment to high public office only of these candidates will be ready to the dictates of the corrupt corporations… These bankers international and Rockefeller Standard Oil interests control the majority of newspapers and magazines in this country. »

1923

Calvin Coolidge

On 2 August, President Warren Harding died on a train in mysterious circumstances. The cause was given as food poisoning or a stroke, although no autopsy was performed. He was replaced by his Vice President Calvin Coolidge. President Coolidge continued Harding’s tax cutting and tariff raising policies.

This policy was so successful that the economy continues to grow and the huge debt accumulated during the war, under Harding and Coolidge was reduced by 38% to $ 16 billion. It was when the federal reserve started flooding the country with money, by increasing the money supply by 62%.

Representative Charles A Lindbergh SR. has said,

« The financial system… has been returned to… the Federal Reserve Board. » That Board administers the system of financing by the authority of… a purely profiteering group. The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible benefits from the use of the money of others. »

1924

Shortly before his death this year, president Woodrow Wilson made the following statement with regard to its support for the federal reserve.

« I’ve unwittingly ruined my country. »

1927

Montagu Norman

In July, in Europe, Bank of England Governor Montagu Norman, Benjamin Strong of the Federal Reserve Bank and Dr. Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, met at the Conference.

No public report have never been of these conferences, which has happened on numerous occasions and were quite informal, but which covered several important issues of movements of gold, the stability of world trade and the global economy.

Benjamin Strong

Montagu Norman was obsessed with returning the gold that England had lost in America during the first world war and the Bank of England to return to its former dominance in the world of finance.

Member of Republican Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking & currency Committee, from 1920 to 1931, would comment on the plan of the Bank of England in the middle of the great depression in February 1931, when he said,

Hjalmar Schacht

« I think that it can hardly be disputed that the statesmen and European financiers are ready to take any means to reacquire rapidly the stock of gold as Europe lost as a result of the war in America.  »

1929

Rockefeller

In April, Paul Warburg sent a secret warning message to his friends that a collapse and nationwide depression had planned for later this year. It is certainly no coincidence that the biographies of all the giants of Wall Street at the time: Rockefeller; J. P. Morgan; Joseph Kennedy; Bernard Baruch; and al., any surprise the fact these people is out of the stock market completely just before the accident and put their assets in cash or gold.

Thus, all bankers and their friends already knew, in the month of August the federal reserve began to tighten the money supply. Then on 24 October, senior bankers from New York called in their loans broker 24 hours a day. This meant that securities brokers and their clients had to empty their stocks on the stock market to cover their loans, regardless of what price they had to sell it for.

As a result, the stock market crashed on a day that will go down in history as, « Black Thursday ». In his book, The Great Crash 1929, John Kenneth Gailbraith makes the following shocking statement.

« At the height of the frenzy of selling, Bernard Baruch brought Winston Churchill in the Gallery of the New York Stock Exchange to attend the panic and impress with his power on the wild events on the ground. »

Member of Republican Congressman, Louis T McFadden, Chairman of House Banking & currency Committee, from 1920 to 1931, was as usual quite sincere about who was responsible. He said this crash,

« He was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence… The international bankers sought to establish a State of despair here so that they could emerge as leaders of us all. »

Joseph Kennedy

Curtis b. Dall, son-in-law of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who was working for Lehmann Brothers as a broker on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, the day of the accident, said in his 1967 book, F. D. R. My father-in-law operated,

« In fact, it was the calculated ‘shearing’ of the public by the world money powers triggered by the planned sudden shortage of call money in the New York money market. »

Despite the assertions of how the federal reserve would protect the country against depressions and inflation, they continued to further contract the money supply. Between 1929 and 1933, they have reduced the money supply by an additional 33%. Similarly, Milton Friedman, the Nobel Peace Prize winning economist, stated in an interview with the radio in January 1996,

« The federal reserve certainly caused the great depression by contracting the amount of currency in circulation by one-third between 1929 and 1933 ».

Milton Friedman

In just a few weeks from the day of the accident, 3 billion dollars of wealth was arrested. Less than a year, 40 billion dollars of wealth disappeared. However, it does not simply disappear, it just finished consolidated in the hands of less and less, as was planned. An example of this is Joseph P. Kennedy, father of Kennedy. In 1929, he was worth 4 million dollars, in 1935, which had risen to more than $ 100 million.

This is why depressions are due. As shown previously leading bankers and their friends are out of stock and bought gold market just before the accident, they were delivered to London. This means that the money lost by most Americans in the crash did not simply disappear, everything ends up in the hands of these people.

It was also spent overseas, as while the great depression occurred, millions of U.S. dollars has been devoted to rebuilding Germany from damage suffered during the war world I, in preparation for the bankers of the second world war. Republican Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of House Banking & currency from 1920 to 1931 Committee, stated the following in this regard,

« After the first world war, Germany fell into the hands of the German International bankers. These bankers he bought and now they have it, lock, stock and barrel. They bought its industries, they have mortgages on its soil, they control its production, they control all of its public services.

The German international bankers have subsidized the current German Government and they have also supplied every dollar of money, that adolph Hitler used in his lavish campaign to pose a threat to the Government of Bruening. BRUENING fails to obey the orders of the German International bankers, Hitler is brought to scare the Germans into submission…

Through the Federal Reserve Board… over 30 billion dollars of American money has pumped in Germany… You have all heard of expenditure which has been held in Germany… modernist housing, her great planetariums, her gym, swimming pools, its fine highways, its perfect plants.

All this has been done on our money. All of this was given to Germany through the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board… has pumped so billion in Germany that they dare not name total. »

The money pumped in Germany to accumulate in anticipation of the second world war, has been in the German Thyssen banks which were affiliated to the interests of Harriman in New York.

1930

Bank for international settlements

The Bank for international settlements (bis) was created by Charles g. Dawes (Rothschild agent and Vice President under President Calvin Coolidge from 1925-1929), Owen d. Young (Rothschild agent, founder of RCA and the Chairman of General Electric from 1922 until 1939) and Hjalmar Schacht of Germany (President of the Reichsbank).

The bis is referred to bankers as the, « Central Bank of central banks. Whereas the IMF and the World Bank to deal with Governments, the bis deals only with other central banks. All meetings are held in secret and involve key across central bankers in the world. For example the former head of the federal reserve, Alan Greenspan, would go to the headquarters of the bis in Basel, Switzerland, ten times per year for these private meetings.

Charles G. Dawes

The bis has also has the status of a sovereign power and is exempt from government control. A summary of this immunity is listed below:
1.Diplomatic for people and this immunity they carry with them (i.e., the pouch).
2.No tax on transactions, including salaries paid to employees.
3.Embassy-type immunity for all the buildings or offices, operated by the bis worldwide including China and the Mexico.
4.No oversight or knowledge of the operations of any governmental authority, they are not checked.
5.Absence of immigration restriction.
6.Freedom to encrypt all communications of any kind.
7.The absence of any legal jurisdiction, they have even their own police force.

Owen D. Young

BIS’ current Board of Directors, only of which five are elected and the rest who are permanent, are:
•Nout H E M Wellink, Amsterdam (Chairman of the Board of Directors)
•Hans Tietmeyer, Frankfurt am Main (Vice-Chairman)
•Axel Weber, Frankfurt am Main
•Vincenzo Desario, Rome
•Antonio Fazio, Rome
•David Dodge, Ottawa
•Toshihiko Fukui, Tokyo
•Timothy F Geithner, New York
•Alan Greenspan, Washington
•Lord George, London
•Hervé Hannoun, Paris
•Christian Noyer, Paris
•Lars Heikensten, Stockholm
•Mervyn King, London
•Guy Quaden, Brussels
•Jean-Pierre Roth, Zürich
•Alfons Vicomte Verplaetse, Brussels

Carroll Quigley

Georgetown Professor and historian, Carroll Quigley, commented on the creation of the Central Bank in his 1975 book, tragedy and hope, as follows,

« The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far reaching (plan), nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. » This system was to be controlled in a way feudalist by the central banks of the world action in concert, by secret agreements arrived at conferences and frequent meetings.

The apex of the system was the Bank of international settlements in Basel,*, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.

Each Central Bank… sought to dominate its Government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world. »

* Home of the first World Zionist Congress, chaired by Theodor Herzl in 1897.
Henry Cabot Lodge

A handful of senators led by Henry Cabot Lodge, fought to keep the United States out of the Bank for international settlements. However, even thought the United States rejected this world Central Bank, members of the federal reserve still sent to participate in its meetings in Switzerland, until 1994, when the United States was « officially », slipped inside.

1932

Herbert Hoover

Republican representative Louis T. McFadden of Pennsylvania, the former Chairman of the House Banking & Currency Committee during the great depression, States,

« We have in this country one of the institutions most corrupt that the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board… This evil institution has impoverished… the people of the United States… and has practically ruined our Government. It did so through… the corrupt practices of the wealthy vultures that control. »

In his last year in office, President Herbert Hoover presented a plan to bail out failing banks, he seemed to feel that they have taken precedence over millions of Americans, from hunger, but this plan has not received the support of the Democratic Congress. Hoover failing Presidency, Roosevelt is elected President later this year.

1933

On 4 March, during his inaugural address, President Roosevelt issued the following statement,

« Practices of the money changers without scruples stand indicted in the Court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men… The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. »

However, later that year, President Roosevelt outlawed private ownership of all gold bullion and all the coins with the exception of the rare coins. Most of the gold in the hands of the average American was in the form of gold coins and this decree by Roosevelt was indeed a confiscation.
William H. Woodin

In the small town of America, people do not trust Roosevelt. However, the people were given a simple choice. Turn in your gold and be paid the official price, 20-66 dollars per ounce, or you will be liable to a fine of $10 000 and a penalty of ten years imprisonment.

This confiscation decision was so unpopular, its author has ever been discovered. No member of Congress has ever claimed having written, President Roosevelt said that he had not written, or that he had even read it. Secretary of the Treasury of Roosevelt, Woodin, claimed that he would never read either, but that it was, he said,

« What the experts wanted. »

I wonder what ‘experts’, he refers!

1934

Lloyd

In its edition of June 20, New Britain magazine of London published a statement made by former British Prime Minister Lloyd .

« Britain is the slave of an international financial block. »

The following words written by Lord Bryce was also in the article,

« Democracy has no more persistent and enemy ambush that money power… questions about the Bank of England, its behavior and its objects, are not authorized by the President (of the House of Commons) ».

Lord Bryce

Louis T. McFadden, Republican Congressman and Chairman of the Committee of the coin of 1920 to 1931 stated, & House Banking

« Through the Fed, that people lose their rights guaranteed to them by the Constitution… decency requires us to examine the public accounts of the Government and see what kind of public welfare offences have been committed… the people of these United States are being greatly wrong… ».

Everything was done by the Fed to conceal its powers – but the truth is the Fed has usurped the Government… the sack of these United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history… what King ever robbed his subject to such an extent that the Fed has stolen us… it is a monstrous thing for this great nation of people to have its destinies presided over by a traitor Governing Council acting in secret concert with international usurer.

« When the Fed was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world system was implemented here… a super-State controlled by international bankers, and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. »

1935

All the gold held by U.S. citizens had eventually released under the order of confiscation of 1933 President Roosevelt at a price of $20 to 66 an ounce. Without explanation the official price of gold then increased to $35 per ounce. The only catch was that only foreigners could sell their gold to the new rise in prices. Where is the price of the global gold market defined? Since 1919, in the same room of Bank privacy N. M. Rothschild & Sons in London, at 11:00, on a daily basis.

Therefore, Warburg and his banking friends who put their money into gold at $20-66 before the crash stock and shipped to London, he could now it forward and sell it to the Government of the United States for the new rise in prices. The money changers have a golden rule,

« He who has the gold, makes the rules.

President Roosevelt ordered the construction of a new deposit of gold bullion to organize the large amount of gold, the Government of the United States had illegally confiscated. This deposit has been Fort Knox.

Fort Knox

1936

On 3 October, Republican MP, Louis T McFadden, Chairman of the Committee of currency, from 1920 to 1931 and House Banking is poisoned to death. It was the third assassination attempt on his life, he had suffered a poisoning earlier and had shots fired at him.

He had tried for years get the federal reserve and that you have read so far, had been very revealing statements about the federal reserve. He had been warned to back off, but this great American Patriot, put the people he represented before himself, as all the elect are supposed to do and was killed by the bankers accordingly.

1937

With Fort Knox having been completed than the previous year, the gold now began to flow in it.

1938

With the federal reserve in the control of the American economy for 25 years under the pretext of promoting monetary stability, it has caused three major economic downturns, including the great depression. As Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman said.

« The stock of money, prices and output was decidedly more unstable after the before reserve system. The most dramatic period of instability in output was, of course, the period between the two wars, which includes the severe (monetary) contractions of 1920-21, 1929-33, and 1937-38. No other period of 20 years in American history contains up to three such severe contractions.

This evidence persuades me that at least one-third of the increase in prices during and just after the world war is attributable to the establishment of the federal reserve system… and that the gravity of each of the main contractions – 1920-21, 1929-33, and 1937-38 – is directly attributable to acts of commission and omission by the authorities of the reserve…

Any system that gives so much power and discretion to a few men, (so) that confuses – excusable or non – can have effects from large litters is a bad system. It is a bad system to believers in freedom just because it gives a few men such power without any effective control by the body politic – it’s the argument key against an independent Central Bank policy… To paraphrase silver Clemenceau is a much too serious to be left to central bankers question. »

Milton Friedman would also declare

« I know of no severe depression, in any country or any time which was not accompanied by a strong decline in the stock of money and also no sharp decline in money supply which was not accompanied by a severe depression. »

1941

Sir Josiah Stamp, Director of the Bank of England in the years 1928-1941, issued the following statement with regard to banking services,

« The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most amazing piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. Bankers own the Earth. Go away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough money to buy it vice versa…

Take advantage of this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they should disappear, because then it would be a better and happier to live world. But if you want to continue to be slaves to banks and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit. »

1944

Harry Dexter White

The income of the United States is running at $ 183 billion, still $ 103 billion is devoted to World War II. It is thirty times the rate of expenditure during World War i. in fact, it is the American taxpayer who picked up 55% of the total allied war.

At Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, the Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (initially called the International Bank of Reconstruction and development or IBRD – the name, « World Bank », is not actually adopted until 1975), were approved with the full participation of the United States.

The principal architects of the Bretton Woods system and therefore the IMF, were Harry Dexter White and John Maynard Keynes. Interestingly, Harry Dexter White who died in 1946, was identified as a Soviet spy whose code name was, « Lawyer », October 16, 1950, in a memo from the FBI. In addition, John Maynard Keynes was a British citizen.

John Maynard Keynes

What these two organizations essentially done was repeat on a world that the National Banking Act of 1864 on the scale, and the 1913 Federal Reserve Act had established in the United States. They created a banking cartel comprising the Central private banks worldwide, who gradually took over the power to dictate credit policies at banks of all nations.

In the same way that the federal reserve Act authorized the creation of a new national currency fiat called on the federal reserve, the IMF has been given the power to issue a currency of world called, ‘special drawing rights’, or SDRs. countries have been encouraged later by making their currencies fully exchangeable for Dts.

The IMF is controlled by its Board of Governors, who are the heads of the different central banks, or the heads of the various departments of the national treasure which are dominated by their central banks. In addition, the power to vote at the IMF gives the United States and the United Kingdom (the federal reserve and the Bank of England), effective control of it.

1945

The second, « League of Nations » renamed « United Nations », was approved. Bankers, World War II, had been a success, this time as a result of physical, emotional, and mental exhaustion, the world had felt after yet another world war. This World Government plan would soon have its own international court system as well.

Organization of the United Nations

1946

The Bank of England was nationalized, which may seem at first glance a large measure, but makes little difference in practice. Yes, the State did acquire all the shares in the Bank of England, now, they belong to the Treasury and are held in trust by counsel for Treasury Board.

However, the Government had no money to pay for the shares, so instead of receiving money for their shares, shareholders were issued with government stocks. Although the State has now received the operating profits of the Bank, this has been offset by the fact that the Government must now pay interest on new stocks that it had issued to pay for the shares.

Thus, although the Bank of England is now public, the fact is that the British money supply is once more almost entirely in private hands, with 97% that it is in the form of loans of a kind or another, bearing interest created by private commercial banks.

As a result, the Bank is largely controlled and managed by the world of commercial bank and the classical economy. Member of the Court of Directors, who set policy and oversee its functions are almost entirely the world of banks, insurance, economists and big business.

Bank of England

Although the Bank of England is called a Central Bank, it is now primarily a regulatory body that supports and oversees the existing system. It is sometimes referred to as « the lender of last resort, » where one of his duties as Bank of the bankers’ is to support any bank or financial institution that gets into difficulties and suffers from a run on its cash.

Interestingly, in these circumstances, it is not required to disclose the details of these measures, the reason being to avoid a crisis of confidence.

1950

All the countries involved in World War II greatly multiplied their debt. Between 1940 and 1950, the United States federal debt increased from 43 billion to $ 257 billion, a 598% increase. During this same period, Japanese debt increased 1 348%, the French debt increased by 583%, and Canadian debt increased by 417%.

James Paul Warburg before the Senate on the statements of February 7th,.

« We shall have World Government, we like it or not. The only question is whether the World Government will be by conquest or consent. »

This is when the central bankers could work on their world government plan which began with a three step plan to centralize the economic systems of the world. These steps were:
1.Bank Central dominance of national economies in the world.
2.Centralized regional economies through super States such as the European Union and the regional unions such as the NAFTA.
3.Centralize the global world economy through the Central Bank, a currency of the world and put an end to national independence through the removal of all tariffs by treaties like GATT.

1953

President Eisenhower

The President Eisenhower orders an audit of Fort Knox. Fort Knox is found to contain more than 700 million ounces of gold, 70% of all the gold in the world.

Although federal law requires a physical audit of Fort Knox gold, it is chaired by Eisenhower that the last verification is performed, for reasons that will soon become clear.

1963

President Kennedy

The President Kennedy issues notes of a dollar that bears a red stamp and called United States Note. Many people believe that he was already printing its own money debt-free and that is why he was killed, in the same way as president Lincoln. However, these tickets from the United States that bears the red stamp were simply a reprint of the Greenbacks introduced by president Lincoln.

What could have been motive, however, is that on 4 June, President Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 that returned to the United States Government the power to issue, without going through the federal reserve. This order gave the Treasury Board the authority to issue certificates silver against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury. This means that for every ounce of silver in the vault of the Treasury of the United States, the Government could introduce new money free of debt outstanding.

1967

Wright Patman

Member of Congressman Wright Patman, then the Chairman of the Standing Committee of banks and currency, said at the Congress,

« In the United States today, we have in effect two Governments… We have the duly constituted Government… Then, we have an independent, uncontrolled Government and not coordinated in the federal reserve system, the money powers which are reserved to Congress by the Constitution of operation ».

1969

Congress approves laws authorizing the federal reserve to accept the IMF, « DTS, » as reserves in the United States and issue federal reserve notes in exchange of SDR.

1971

All pure gold was secretly moved from Fort Knox, sold to changers of international money for the $35 per ounce price and is supposed to keep now in London. It is also when President Nixon repeals Gold Reserve Act of 1934 Roosevelt, allowing Americans to buy once again gold. Following this price of gold began to skyrocket. Indeed, 9 years later, in 1980, gold sold for $880 $us an ounce, a staggering 25 times what the gold in Fort Knox was sold to international bankers.

1974

Nelson Rockefeller

A New York periodical publishes an article stating that the Rockefeller family was handling the federal reserve for the purposes of the sale of gold from Fort Knox to bargain for anonymous European speculators price.

3 days after the publication of this story, its anonymous source, Secretary of longtime Nelson Rockefeller, Louise Auchincloss Boyer, mysteriously fell to his death from the window of his ten-storey building in New York.

1975

Edith Roosevelt

Edith Roosevelt, granddaughter of president Theodore Roosevelt challenged the Government’s actions in an edition of March 1975 of the New Hampshire Sunday News, in which she stated,.

‘ Allegations of gold missing from our Fort Knox safes are widely discussed in European financial circles. ‘ But what is curious is that the Administration is not hastening to show with certainty that there is no cause for concern on our gold treasure, if indeed he is able to do so. »

The Government of the United States is still not undertook an audit of the gold at Fort Knox to quell this speculation.

1981

Ronald Reagan

When President Ronald Reagan took office, his conservative friends him suggested that he return to a gold standard, as a way to curb government spending.

President Reagan was on board with this idea and so he appointed a group of men called the, « Gold Commission, » to undertake a feasibility study study and report their findings to Congress.

1982

President Reagan, « Gold Commission, » reports to the Congress and made the following statement shocking concerning gold.

« The treasure of the u. s. does owned no gold at all. All the gold that remained at Fort Knox was now owned by the federal reserve, a group of private bankers, as a guarantee against the national debt. »

1983

So that Government of Ecuadorreceived a loan of 1.5 billion dollars to the IMF, they have been forced to take over the unpaid private elite of the Ecuador due to private banks. In addition to ensure that the Ecuador could repay this loan, the IMF dictated increases in prices of electricity and other public services. When the IMF provide enough money, they ordered Ecuador to dismiss 120 000 workers.

Ecuador were required to do a variety of things according to a schedule prescribed by the IMF. They included: increase in the price of the gas cooking fuel of 80% from November 1, 2000; transfer of ownership of its largest foreign operators water system; granting of British Petroleum rights to build and own an oil pipeline over the Andes; and eliminating the jobs of workers more and reducing the wages of those remaining 50 percent.

1985

To illustrate the vast majority of the money is not yet printed today, please see the following speech by the late Lord Beswick , who appeared in HANSARD, November 27, 1985, vol. 468, columns 935-939, under the title, « Money supply and Private Banking System », where it is said

« Lord Beswick rose to draw attention to the statement made by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster on 23 July 1985 that the 96.9 per cent increase in money supply over a period of five years was created by the banking system private and without permission from the Government.

The noble Lord said: ‘ My Lords, on 10 June of this year, I asked the Government of his Majesty of this amount of money supply increased in the period of five years in the middle of April, 1985. Interestingly, they gave me the answer in percentage and not in the books. Him having given prior notice, the Minister would be perhaps good enough more to give me the answer in terms of money.

The response of the Government on June 10 was that the increase had been by 101.9%, and that this very large quantity only 5 per cent was explained by the striking of State of several coins and printing of notes more. This 96.9% increase represented not only a huge amount of money, but also a crucial factor in our economy.

I wanted to know by whom it was created, and on 23 July, I asked again HMG to what extent this increase had government approval. I was told by the Chancellor of the Duchy, speaking for the Government, ‘ The 96.9% represented new bank deposits created in the ordinary course of banking and no government authority is necessary for this.  »

He said that some counterfeiter of coins or forger of notes had been at work that it would of course be an immediate and indignant shields lifting, still here, we have a statement of the Government that private institutions have created this enormous amount of additional buying power and we’re supposed to accept that it is a normal practice and that the Government authorities do not in.

When I asked whether we should not to consider more deeply, which took advantage of this power of money creation, the Minister has stated that the consequences, although interesting, were perhaps too extended to time issues, and raise the issue still under debate, and I hope to have more lights.

The stakes are high, they are certainly sous-discutes, may not be sufficiently understood, and I hope that I am not being unduly unfair if I say that those who understand the mechanisms often come out very well of them. I don’t do any party point; It is all so much bigger and broader than that. »

Notice how the Chancellor of the Duchy gave the game when he said that there was no government authority required for this current system of credit creation.

1987

Edmond de Rothschild creates the World Conservation Bank which aims to transfer the debts of countries of the third world to this Bank and in return these countries would give land to this bank.

This is designed so that the Rothschilds can take control of the third world which represents 30% of the land surface of the Earth.

1988

The three branches of the Central Bank, the World Bank, the bis and the IMF, now generally referred as the Central Bank of the world, through their BIS arm, require the bankers of the world increase their capital and reserves to 8% of their commitments of 1992. This increase to put an upper limit on fractional reserve lending of capital required.

To raise money, the bankers of the world had to sell reserves hold their individual stock markets and began depressions in those countries. For example, in Japan, one of the countries where the lowest capital in reserve, the value of its stock market crashed by 50%, and commercial real estate crashed by 60% within two years.

The idea is for the IMF to create more than SDR supported by nothing, in order for nations struggling to borrow them. These nations and then will gradually under the control of the IMF in their struggle to pay interest and must borrow more. The IMF will decide which countries can borrow more and that will starve to death. They can also use it as a lever to assume State owned assets such as utilities as a means of payment against the debt until they eventually have nation-States.

1991

David Rockefeller

The Conference of Bilderberg June 6 to 9, in Baden-Baden, in Germany, David Rockefeller made the following statement,

« We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.

But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to March towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to national self-determination practiced in past centuries. »

Note: click here for a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet with a list of people at the Bilderberg conferences.

1992

Boris Yeltsin

The third world debtor countries which had borrowed from the World Bank, pay $ 198 million more, to the central banks of developed countries for purposes of funded by the World Bank, they receive from the World Bank. This will only increase their permanent debt in Exchange for temporary relief of the poverty which is caused by the payments on previous loans, the repayments that already exceed the amount of new loans.

This year the debt outside of Africa had reached $ 290 billion, which is two and a half times larger than its level in 1980, which resulted in a deterioration of schools, deterioration of the habitat, skyrocketing infant mortality rates, a drastic decline in the overall health of the people and mass unemployment.

The Washington Times reports that Russian President Boris Yeltsin, was upset that most incoming foreign aid was siphoned off the coast, and he said,

«Straight into the coffers of the banks in the West to service the debt.

This year American taxpayers pay reserve Federal $ 286 billion in interest on the debt the federal reserve, purchased by printing money costs almost free.

1994

The Regal Act is introduced in the United States to authorize the replacement of the greenbacks president Lincoln with debt based notes. They lasted 132 years.

1996

Have you ever wondered why the production of everyone seems to move to China? In a report entitled « China into the 21st century economy, » released this year, it provides that the income per capita in China in 2010, will be about $ 735. It is less than 30 dollars more than the definition of the World Bank of a low income country.

1997

Tony Blair

Less than two months before Tony Blair came to power in England, another interesting entry found in HANSARD, March 5, 1997, volume 578, no. 68, 1869-1871, in which the Earl of Caithness is recorded as having declared, columns

« The next Government must seize the bull by the horns, take their responsibilities to control the money supply and change of our debt-based monetary system. » Your Lordships, will they? If they do not, our monetary system will break us and inheritance sorry that we already leave our children will be a disaster. »

Gordon Brown

On 6 may, only four days after Blair’s election as Prime Minister, Finance Minister Gordon Brownannounces that it will give its independence from political control of the Bank of England.

In his 1997 book, the Grand chessboard, Zbigniew Brzezinski reveals that the Germany is the major shareholder of the World Bank. When you bear in mind that the lineage of the Rothschild bankers allegedly own Germany, « lock, stock and barrel », at the end of the first world war, it is not hard to see who controls the World Bank now.

1998

The IMF eliminate food subsidies and fuel for the poor in Indonesia. At the same time, the IMF has absorbed tens of billions of dollars to save the financiers of the Indonesia or rather the international banks, which they had borrowed.

A document escapes the World Bank, entitled, ‘Master Plan for the Brazil’. In it, he sets out five requirements to ensure a flexible workforce in public sector. These are as follows:
•Reduce the salary and benefits
•Reduce Pensions
•Increasing the hours of work
•Reduce the stability of employment
•Reduction of employment

1999

At the Brazil privatized electric company of Rio named, « Rio light, » is responsible for blackouts in neighborhoods. The company accuses the weather in the Pacific ocean for power outages, when Rio is on the Atlantic coast. Power cuts have nothing to do with the fact that, after privatization Rio light axed 40% of the active population of society would it? No problem for Rio light, as well as their share price went up 33%.

2000

The IMF requires the Argentina reduce its current $ 5.3 billion to $ 4.1 billion Government budget deficit the following year, 2001. At this time there unemployment operated at 20% of the active population. They were then upped the ante and demanded an elimination of the deficit. The IMF had some ideas how this could be done. Cut the program emergency employment from the Government of $200 per month to $160 per month.
James Wolfensohn

They also requested a through the governing body 12-15% cut in salaries for civil servants and cutting pensions to the elderly by 13%. In December 2001, class average Argentine sick of hunting literally the streets for garbage to eat, started burning down Buenos Aires. In January Argentina devalued the Peso, wiping out the value of common savings of many people. Dismayed that they cannot violate that more countries, World Bank President James Wolfensohnsaid.

« Almost all major utilities have been privatized.

How that they control the unrest within the population? I would like to see an Argentinean bus driver, a thirty-seven year, father of five children, lost his job as a bus driver from a company that owed him 9 months of salary. During a demonstration against this and other injustices perpetrated upon him and the people, military police shot him dead with a bullet in the head.

In Tanzania , with approximately 1.3 million people die of AIDS, the World Bank and the IMF decided to require Tanzania to charge what were previously free hospital appointments. They also classified in Tanzania to charge tuition for their previously free education system and then was surprised when the enrolment increased from 80% to 66%.

The IMF and the World Bank have been in charge of the economy since 1985 Tanzania during which Tanzania time of GDP dropped from $ 309 to $ 210 per capita, literacy standards dropped and the absolute poverty rate increased to 51% of the population of the envelope. When the IMF and the World Bank took over in 1985, Tanzania is a socialist country. In June 2000, the World Bank reported arrogantly,

« A legacy of socialism is that most people continue to believe that the State has a fundamental role in promoting the development and provision of social services. »

There is rioting in Bolivia after the World Bank drastically increase the price of water. The claim of the World Bank that it is necessary to provide desperately needed repairs and expansion. It’s nonsense, my own water supplier is Wessex Water, a privatized water which was in fact owned by Enron company! Since privatization (England was the first country to privatize public water supply), the quality has declined and prices have exploded.

Almost all water companies privatised in Great Britain do not always meet the objectives of the Government on the leaks.

2001

Joseph Stiglitz

Professor Joseph Stiglitz, former Chief Economist of the World Bank and Council of Economic Advisers of the former President of President Clinton, goes public over the World Bank, « four step strategy, » intended to enslave nations to bankers. I summarize this below,

First step: privatization.
It is, in fact, where national leaders are offered to their bank accounts secret Swiss in Exchange for trimming them a few billion dollars on the sale price of national property, the commissions of 10%. Bribery and corruption, pure and simple.

Second step: the liberalisation of capital markets.
It is the repeal of laws that money to tax beyond its borders. Stiglitz calls it, « hot money, » cycle. Initially cash comes from abroad to speculate on real estate and currency, then when the economy in this country begin to look promising, this outside wealth came out straight again, causing the collapse of the economy.

The nation then needs help from the IMF and the IMF provides on the pretext that they raise rates ranging from 30% to 80%. This has happened in Indonesia and the Brazil, also in other Asian and Latin American countries. These higher interest rates decline as a result of a country, demolishing property values, devastate industrial production and evacuate national treasures.

Third step: market prices.
This is when the price of food, water and household gas are raised which leads predictable social unrest in the country respective, now more commonly called, « IMF riots. » These riots cause the flight of capital and Government bankruptcy. This benefits foreign companies as the remaining active nations can be purchased at lower prices.

Fourth step: free trade.
This is where multinationals explode in Asia, Latin America and Africa, while at the same time, Europe and America barricade their own markets against third world agriculture. They also impose exorbitant rates that these countries must pay for branded pharmaceuticals, causing high rates of mortality and morbidity

There are many losers in this system, but a few winners – bankers. In fact the IMF and the World Bank have made the sale of electricity, water, telephone and gas systems a condition of loans to all developing Nations. It is estimated at 4 trillion dollars of public assets.

In September of this year, Professor Joseph Stiglitz was awarded the Nobel Prize in economics.

2002

Hugo Chavez

April 12, each important communication in the USA is running a story that Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez had resigned as he was, ‘unpopular and dictatorial’. In fact, he had been kidnapped by a coup, where he was imprisoned on a military base. Following the sympathy of the guard, the coup collapses and president Chavez is back in his office the next day. Interestingly, he has video evidence that while he was imprisoned at that base a military attaché of United States entry in the base.

President Chavez, demonized by the controlled Western media, gives milk and housing to the poor and gives land not used for the production of large planters for more than two years, to those without land. His great crime was however, passing an oil law that doubled the taxes of royalty from 16% to 30% on the new discoveries of oil, which touched Exxon Mobil and other international oil operators.

It also took full control of the State oil company, PDVSA, which before was nominally owned by the Government, but in reality, was in line with these international oil operators. Not only that, but president Chavez is also the President of OPEC (Organization of petroleum exporting countries). The main reason is, however, that president Chavez fully rejects the World Bank, « Four step strategy » and plan to reduce the salaries of the population for the benefit of the bankers.

Indeed, president Chavez has increased the minimum wage by 20%, which has increased the purchasing power of lower paid workers and strengthened the economy. His Minister, Miguel Bustamante Madriz, fully aware of the bankers danger Venezuela poses when people contrast the fact that it did not, for example, with the Argentina who did, said,

« America cannot we need to stay in power. » We are an exception to the new realities of globalization. If we succeed, we are an example for all the Americas. »

2006

America and Britain is now at war in Afghanistan and Iraqand looking toward an invasion of the Iran. As I said the largest generator of debt of all is war. This led America on the verge of financial collapse. This timeline is designed as a record of the past, but before look you at the conclusions, you can enjoy watching the prediction of a person for the near future in this article amazing.

Conclusions

In my research, I discovered these critics currently condemning the monetary system almost universally suggest that the only solution is to restore a gold backed currency. I do not think that any readers of this timeline may be doubt that such a system will be open to abuse from these people who abuse it today. Indeed if we introduced a currency accompanied by chairs, I believe that we would end up with nothing to sit!

The only monetary system that seems to have worked in the story is one that is supported by the goodwill of a Government and is free, as president Lincoln’s debt, « Greenbacks ». Fortunately, peace Nobel Prize winner Economist Milton Friedman came up with an ingenious back solution snatch money from bankers, pay off all debts outstanding and prevent inflation or deflation then the process is complete. I summarize this below.
Using America as the example here, Friedman suggests that debt free United States notes issued to repay the obligations of the United States (debts) on the open market. Parallel to this, the reserves of the Bank on the day the day the ordinary person with banks, being proportionally so the Mount of money in circulation remains constant.

As persons holding bonds are paid in United States banknotes, they will deposit the money in the Bank they Bank with, which makes available the currency then needed by these banks to increase their reserves. Once that all obligations of the United States are paid with tickets in the United States, the banks will be at the reserve Bank’s 100% instead of the fractional reserve system and then fractional reserve banking can be outlawed.

If necessary, other liabilities of financial institutions could be assumed or acquired by the Government of the United States in a one-off operation. Therefore these institutions would eventually be paid with tickets from the United States to maintain stable monetary mass.

Should also repeal the 1913 Federal Reserve Act and the National Banking Act of 1864 and any monetary power transferred to the Department of the Treasury. The effects of this will be very soon seen by the average person that their taxes would start to go down as they are more would pay interest on the money debt based to a handful of central bankers.

A law should be passed to make you that no banker or any person in any way affiliated with a financial institution, the power to regulate banking. Also in the United States must withdraw from all international debt based namely Central Bank operations. the IMF; the bis; and the World Bank. It would be good for the Greeks, and others, we, among other

If all countries of the world adopted the conclusions above, then humanity will be finally free from these central bankers and their debt based currency. It is a nice idea, but first need it cross our corrupt politicians which many are perfectly aware of the scam that plays us on a daily basis, however rather than do the work that we have chosen to do, they keep their mouth closed and instead look after themselves and their families, while the rest of us continue to be exploited.

« For what it will benefit men more prudent distribution and utilization of resources making it possible for them to win even in the world, if so they suffer the loss of their own souls? » What will benefit teach them sound economy principles, if they allow themselves to be so carried away by selfishness, by unbridled and sordid greed, which, ‘on hearing the commandments of the Lord, they do all things contrary.’

Pope Pius XI

Sources
The life of William Ewart Gladstone

John Morley

1903

Secrets of the federal reserve

Eustace Mullins

1952

The great crash of 1929

John Kenneth Gailbraith

1955

F. D. R. My exploited father-in-law

Curtis B. Dall

1967

Collective speeches of MP Louis T. McFadden

Louis T. McFadden

1970

A monetary history of the United States, 1867-1960

Milton Friedman and Anna

1971

No he dares to call conspiracy

Gary Allen

1972

Tragedy and hope: a history of the world in our time

Carroll Quigley

1975

The truth in money book

Theodore R. Thoren and Richard F. Warner

1984

The Grand chessboard

Zbigniew Brzezinski

1997

The creature from Jekyll Island: a Second look at the Federal Reserve – 3rd edition

G. Edward Griffin

1998

The money changers

Patrick S. J. Carmack

1998

The shadow of power: the Council on foreign policy and the American decline – 2002 edition

James Perloff

2002

Globalization and Its Discontents

Stiglitz

2003

Publicités

Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion / Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion / Changer )

Connexion à %s