06052015C E BUSHNWO1

Hello all , 060502015 C Bushnwop1 part1

I’d, I’d let the e place the Presidency in the Senate, as said, constitution.sincerement, you should do what I tell you,

Is frankly too funny and too much bullshit, because, you’ll know what I find funny is how they are capable of going to fuck the shit, as, they are cornered, they do the forcing sue the LOGUE family, I realize counts, too, whether JEAN MARIE, MARINE, MARION, FLORIAN, and others, that je do not forget ,silent , before a door, it finds the way to talk about them, to lie on the LOGUE, but gentlemen ladies of fascism, etde pyramid, you can do, everything you want, all way MARINE PASSERA, and can be, sooner than you think you know, why, I will tell it to you,(tiens,ça me rappel,quelqu’un) (I have not its inimitable ICT, the little demon of SARKO, I see, with a little red costume, and his head dodelinante with a trident, and vall, FURHER, smacking her boot heels) ((jevois bien,les 2 en petites poupées,que l’on met à l’avant, ou,à l’arrière de sa voilure (vous savez,celles qui sont sur ressort))) (, which move whenever it passes on a bump) brief, therefore, it will pass because the french people has never been a fascist people, and will never ,and two, forty years of insults and lies on the french people and especially on the LOGUE, that you had done with all these heads of State liars pompidou, vge , mitterrand, chirac, sarko, hollande(c’est pas dans l’odre), with valls this small fascist of my 2, which is taken to I don’t know, what, which (that it order to lick the pumps of Castrie, they will be disgusting BILDERBERG is not him), pond laws on the computer (that, I told you that BIG BROTHER IS WATCHIN YOU, but he coultn can’t, we we see will) , among others, all more rotten the ones than the others that are either saying for terrorists, but we know that it is for us(, but sincerely, I, you, I dégagerais quickly for, that there is still time), but really, and three, you believe, frankly, now passes, if you believe what you are really crazy. (People Austrians, you see what, you expect, don’t believe them especially not , Ditto for the other peoples, especially the Queen of England, Cameron, the + known English paedophile, except the Queen.)

England, Scotland, part of the Ireland do, suffice you, you wanted Europe,(c’est vrai que vous avez de origine allemande COBURG,de SAXE), hitler WWI, WWII, and the famous WWIII, but, the, even if you try with UKRAINE, and therefore of the destabilised, with a fascist regime, as if by chance, but beware, that precisely this WWIII, do you pette to hangover , and does not effect expected as you wish (and fortunately, it is + as possible, but, not like, you hear it,) but rather, that Windsor, the Elysée Palace, the national Assembly, France lodges, from England, United States of the world, from Africa, the Congress imagine there is hundreds, thousands, millions, hundreds of millions of people, who arrived but frankly , you really want to end up like Ceausescu, and that behind the Castle, in the gardens of Windsor Castle, and nobody can do anything for you, the dice will be cast, as you like!, I speak of course of the France and the UK, and United States, you know, when it’s going to tumbled down, even a squadron of 10 to 20 men , will not be enough to stop it, especially not play does not play the hero, you risk to lose the life, because when it arrived, it does not in the details, all way if people, who will be part of the crowd, can be your brother, your onle, your niece, brefquelqu’ a devotre family and it is also for you, and if , you get out, think at least your children and your grandchildren and your descendants, if, one day, you

You know, MARINE, JEAN MARIE, MARION, FLORIAN, as you say nothing, moreover, continue like that, and go for, I don’t know what motive, which has sued with criminal, R 226.11, R 226.3, leR226.7, you should be fine, non-MARINE! There, we can not say, you had twists, the WSPU , exists, I already knew, this is for you show, you had twists we under estimate (filing a UCC1 financing statement,.. and OU have taken to tench, the English first, which you submit this dishcloth, and others, that I do not know.) You realize, than ever before, I had seen one such brothel pareil(c’est pas bien MARINE,ah, non,vraiment,c’est pas bien,GAG, je plaisante) just made, you piss off so many, proves, that this 40 years, that they are lying and that they have some thing to this reproach, and that you were as close to the Presidency .car prepares you MARINE , it happens they speak for you, they say false things about you (as usual), some believe, but they realize very quickly the hoax that said, they. forget one thing, is that person, has the must steal the identity of someone, or speak, or sign in place of…, and this, under certain conditions. Even if they are in fuck, apparently, it is the case for the moment, at a moment, it will snap them to the hangover, they will be much obliged to bother, you have understood their game, we also, have content fuck shit in GAZA(avec l’autre petit fasciste de Netanyahou), in sirye with these arms deliveries, where QATAR and Turkey are not étranger(rappelez vous de l’échange de ces 47 je crois, pas sur, mecs à la Turquie.) Their EI States, climbing from scratch with the help of the CIA, and the MOSSADl’ aid of QATAR http://tulisanmurtad.blogspot.fr/2012/04/muslim-brotherhood-nazi-connection.html

Here, gentlemen, ladies iliminees

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.NET/Bush/bushb.htmPOUR ADMIRERS of BUSH, and all evidence of involvement


http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com thrild world

Thirdworldization of America http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/

/ Police State watch http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/

The Secret Government http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Moyers/SecretGovt_Moyers.html

New world disorder http://geopolitics.co/category/new-world-disorder/l

Small precision, under each name, or title, you have a name written in small font 8, I believe

Click these often, a web site, edward, I found, or you worked, you you some, when, even at the bottom of the pyrammide of the service, mazet, Mr Snowden, I wouldn’t you enough recognizing, again, thanks, to you, hats, very, very, very, low, even lower, Mr E. SNOWDEN


committee300 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.NET/esp_sociopol_committee300.htm

Scam of carbon by the United Nations and World Bank behind ‘Genocidal’ land grabs


Common core and UN, Agenda 21 (- mass producing green global Serfs)


You have the Green that you represented, PLACE, yet, when you arrived from Korea, you had a brain

Executive Intelligence Review

This article appears in the Issue 9 August 2013 from Executive Intelligence Review.

The Muslim Brotherhood:
The many faces of their Majesty’s Service

by Marcus Ramtanu

[PDF version of this article]

July 17 – July 3 Egyptian President’s removal, Mr. Mohamed Morsi, by a combination of forces that included the opposition of the public by a large part of the Egyptian people and the Egyptian army, has highlighted the historic role of the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan al-Muslimeen, or MB). Morsi, a prominent member of the MB, has been President of freedom and the party of Justice (CLE) when it was founded by the brotherhood in the wake of the Egyptian revolution of 2011 that overthrew the president Hosni Mubarak. Morsi won the presidential election of June 2012 as the candidate of the CLE and was in power for a year.

Removal of Morsi was openly welcomed in Saudi Arabia, one of the main funders of the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood in the world, but strongly condemned by Qatar, which had the most generous donor tried to keep afloat the Government Morsi. Fall of Morsi is also deplored by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his AKP’s Pro-fraternite party. It is clear that Erdogan had developed a close and ideological relationship with Morsi and the brothers in Egypt.

Is that mean a split occurred within the brotherhood on rule of the regime Morsi, or in Egypt, anarchy? That is highly unlikely. Since its inception, in Egypt, in 1928, this international outfit has had many faces:

· In 1928, the Egypt was under British control, although not a British colony, and the brotherhood built links with the British secret service and worked to help the British.

· He formed an alliance with the Nazis during the second world war.

· He then returned to serve British interests once more, trying to oust the nationalist regime of President Gamal Abdel Nasser.

· He was a key player in the rise of the Islamic jihadist groups that helped the West to fend off Soviet troops from Afghanistan.

· It allowed his supporters to attack the assets of the West, culminating in the attack on 9/11 on US soil.

· It is now back again serving the West by providing labour for « regime change » in the Arab world and North Africa and jeopardize Russian interests in Central Asia.

This detour has hidden the real objective of the brotherhood of many, allowing it to ensure the assistance of various international, especially British intelligence agencies and thus to spread his wings later in the Arab world, North Africa, Central Asia and Europe.

The MB, which is an underground organization and secret in most countries, requires of course money to operate and must be protected. This makes it vulnerable to penetration by various intelligence agencies and also dependent on its financial patrons, such as the Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Expenses of the Qatar of buckets of money to support Morsi & Co. has allowed this country to get a grip on Egyptian President, CLE and Egypt as a whole, thus expanding its influence beyond the shores of the Arabian peninsula. In addition, the site of Dubai Nuqudy reported that, since the announcement of Qatar’s 1 billion dollars of loans to Egypt, opposition to Morsi claimed that he intended to rent or even sell the Suez Canal to Qatari leaders. [1] accusations of the opposition comes from the despair of the Government of Egypt, which is in the need of vital cash and foreign exchange reserves because of its budget deficit by $ 22.5 billion, according to the report based in Dubai.

The Faces at the beginning of the Muslim Brotherhood

Well before that the Muslim Brotherhood has been formed, the British had taken control of the Egypt. After the construction of the Suez Canal by the French in 1869, which improved the connection of Great Britain with the Indian sub-continent under British colonial rule and reduce time to travel from London to Bombay (now Mumbai), Britain sought an opportunity to take control of the canal, to serve its geo-strategic interests.

At the time, the channel was under control of the French and the Khedive Ismail Pasha, the ruler of Egypt, with Britain holding a minority share. The opportunity sought by London popped up in 1875, when it became clear that the Khedive had itself obtained in serious economic difficulties. He approached Britain to raise funds, and with Baron Rothschild dishing out money to his good friend, British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, Britain got hold shares of the Khedive in the company of the Suez Canal. From one day to the next, the British moved from a minority shareholder in the controlling shareholder.

But the money that the Khedive obtained for the case was not sufficient to last a long time. In 1882, the economic situation of the Egypt reached a new crisis and this time, the British and French Governments launched a « stewardship » of the finances of the Egypt. It was little more mixed colonization, as ‘Experts’ British and French were sent to various departments to take control of the day-to-day operations. The refusal to accept these terms and conditions of the Khedive was awarded his forced abdication and replacement by his son Tawfiq. The small number of revolts against the Europeans was repressed by Britain with an iron hand.

In 1928, when an Egyptian schoolteacher named Hasan al-Banna has formed the Ikhwan al-Muslimeen, Egypt was a protectorate of Great Britain, which controlled its finances, the Government and the armed forces staff. With regard to the international status of Egypt, decisions have been taken in London; but with regard to the internal administration of the country, the Consul general views were generally decisive. Throughout the occupation, the facade of an Egyptian Government, under the first, has been preserved, British advisers attached to the various departments have more influence than their Ministers, while Consul general has steadily increased his control over the administrative machine together.

In this environment, the Brotherhood was implemented as a religious secret society known publicly to focus on Islamic education and for its charitable activities. But soon after it was formed, a British intelligence agent, Freya Stark, appeared on the scene in Egypt.

Stark, a self-proclaimed-hateful Jew, was a wandering agent of British intelligence during the second world war. In his book East is West (1945), she compared ‘Fascist Rome,’ « Zionist in Jerusalem » and « The British Empire ». She wrote: « the Web of the Middle East in all these centuries gathered threads of many colors. and not return to simple black and white will never be again – or the dream of Rome fascist or Zionist Jerusalem, this British form of the empire which became obsolete. »

Stark served with the British in the Middle East to counter Nazi influence in Aden, Cairo and Baghdad. Later she also sent on a mission in the United States, the Canada and India. Once in Cairo, she soon implemented the Ikhwan al-Hurriyah (Brotherhood of Freedom), ostensibly to monitor German growing activities in North Africa. Soon she took contact with the brotherhood and became a source of London on many different political movements which have been drawn up in Egypt, with the help of Banna and his people.

In other words, since its inception, the Muslim Brotherhood was a spy for the British secret service.

But this was not the only face of the habit « Islamic » Banna, and MB moved soon into its next phase, developing links with the Nazis.

Hitler with a beard

As the Nazis rose to power in the 1930s, the brotherhood has been with the arrival in Egypt under British control. According to John Loftus, former Prosecutor with the U.S. Department of State and a former army intelligence officer, in addition to his accent initial on social protection and the law of Sharia, the followers of the brotherhood attracted in Egypt and the greater Middle East due to its anti-Jewish stand. The end of the second world war, the MB could boast half a million members. Its founder, al-Banna, has helped distribute Arabic translations of Hitler Mein Kampf and the protocols of the elders of Zion, thus feeding the growing hostility against the Jews and their Western supporters. Banna expressed his zeal in these terms: « A nation that perfected the industry of death and who knows how to die nobly, God gives proud in this world and eternal life through the life to come, » and, « we are not afraid of death, we wish… Let us die in redemption for Muslims. »

« Mr. al-Banna was a great admirer of the young Austrian writer named Adolf Hitler. His letters to Hitler were so favorable that when Hitler came to power in the 1930s, he had a Nazi intelligence make contact with al-Banna to see if they could work together, « said Loftus.  » [2] the political and military alliance of the brotherhood with the Nazi Germany flourished in official State visits, de facto ambassadors and overt and covert ventures.

When World War II broke out, Banna has worked to strengthen its alliance with Hitler and Mussolini. He sent letters and emissaries and urged them to help him in his fight against the British and the westernized system of Farouq King of the Egypt. The service of intelligence of the Muslim Brotherhood, then even invaded by British intelligence services, created a spy network for the Germany Nazi in the Arab world, collecting information on the leaders of the regime in Cairo, as well as the movements of the British army, offering this and more at the hands of the Germans in Exchange for closer relations.

Loftus also mentioned another eminent member of the brotherhood, Haj Mohammad Effendi Amin al-Husseini, who was the representative of the Organization in Palestine and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem (a position which was named by the British, while Palestine was under British occupation, 1917-48). Before becoming Grand Mufti in 1921, al-Husayni was a principal organizer of the massacre of the Jews who prayed at the 1920 Jerusalem wailing wall « bloody Easter ».

While the Nazi connection to the Grand Mufti is widely known, his rise to power was DIY British-Zionist. Although himself a Jew, Sir Herbert Samuel, British High Commissioner, the mandate of Palestine and Zionist (his appointment as High Commissioner was received by the Zionists at the time), named al-Husseini despite strong protests from most of the Palestinian Arabs and Jewish settlers.

Suite in an attempt to create an uprising in Iraq, the Grand Mufti Pro-nazis has fled to Europe to organize the Arab forces disguised as the Third Reich SS divisions. If a war criminal, the Grand Mufti and his troops were prosecuted in Egypt by the British secret service, noted Loftus. [3]

The first direct contact between British officials and the brotherhood came in 1941. Immediately after, the brotherhood has its next step: implementing the widely dreaded unit ‘secret.’ From 1941-42, the Ikhwan set in place this arm of the private intelligence, which quickly became a paramilitary terrorist branch and intelligence spread of the brotherhood. [4]

Mark Curtis points out in his book (see footnote 2) 1942, Britain had certainly begun to finance the brotherhood. On 18 May 1942, British Embassy officials held a meeting with the Minister of finance Egyptian Amin Osman Pasha, discussed relations with the brotherhood, and a number of points have been agreed. One was that « subsidies from the Wafd [Party] – a moderate nationalist party – to the Ikhwan al Muslimeen would discreetly paid by the [Egyptian] Government and they would need financial assistance in this matter of the [British] Embassy. » In addition, the Egyptian Government « would introduce the Ikhwan to watch closely the activities of the reliable agents and we [the English] would have the information obtained from these agents. » We, for our part, would keep the Government in contact with information obtained from British sources. »

The face of the cold war

The defeat of the Nazis and the assassination of al-Banna in 1949, after the members of the brotherhood had assassinated Egyptian Prime Minister did not prevent the growth of the brotherhood in Egypt. Through a complex process, the relations of the group with Britain continued to flourish. In October 1951, the MB elected its new leader a former judge, Hassan al-Hodeibi, who made known his opposition to violence from 1945-49. In 1951, the brotherhood has called for Jihad against the British, including the attacks against the Britons and their property. But it was a dog – and – pony show.

Curtis wrote:

« A report to the British Embassy in Cairo in 1951 end said that the brotherhood ‘ has [es] a terrorist organization for a long time that has never been beaten by the action of the police », despite the recent arrests. « However, the report otherwise minimized intentions of the brothers towards the British, saying they were » plans to send terrorists in the Canal Zone’ but « they do not intend to put their organization as such in the action against the forces of his Majesty ». Another report noted that, although the brotherhood had been responsible for some attacks against the British, it is probably because of « indiscipline » and « seems to conflict with the policy of the leaders ».  »

In December 1951, Curtis notes, records show that British officials have tried to arrange a direct meeting with Hodeibi. Several meetings were held with one of his advisers, Bey Farkhani, about which little is known, although he was apparently not a member of the brotherhood. The indications from the declassified British files show that the leaders of the brotherhood, despite their public calls for attacks against the British, were perfectly prepared to meet them in private. At that time, the Government of Egypt offered Hodeibi « huge bribes » to keep the brotherhood to engage in further violence against the regime, according to the British Foreign Office.

In July 1952, a group of young Nationalist army officers, is committed to overthrowing the Egyptian monarchy and its British advisors, seized power in a coup and proclaimed themselves the Council for the revolutionary command (CRC), with Général Muhammad Naguib as president and The colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser as vice-president. The coup d’Etat was a joint project of many networks of foreign intelligence in association with the Egyptian army officers, mainly British forces, American and French-bound, as well as the kernel Egyptian nationalists. However, some analysts say that general Naguib is closely related to the fraternity, as Anwar el-Sadat, who later became president of Egypt and was murdered. When Finance Minister Amin Osman Pasha was assassinated in 1946, Sadat was arrested for murder.

Is Curtis noted that the Muslim Brotherhood, glad to see the back of the pro-Western regime of the King, initially supported the coup and that he had direct links with the free officers indeed. One of them, El-Sadat, later described his role as before between the free officers and Hassan al-Banna. « He was clearly one of the free officers on whose association with them, the brothers counted to help pursue their political objectives », the British Ambassador in Cairo, Sir Richard Beaumont, later wrote, after Sadat had succeeded Nasser as president in 1970.

Problem of the Brotherhood was Prime Minister Gamal Abdel Nasser. They saw that he and his followers as insufficiently devout, but Nasser was popular and was hated by the British.

Nasser replied to hostilities of the brotherhood by loading with having set up a United army to seize power by force. On October 26, 1954, a gunman fired on Nasser as he gave a speech in Alexandria. Government of Nasser blamed the brotherhood, and thousands of its members have been arrested. The ban on the Brotherhood was a setback for Western powers that Nasser wanted out or dead.

On the other hand, Nasser strives to stabilize the Egypt by undermining the subversive forces such as the brotherhood and its British ally. He moved quickly to modernize and industrialize the country and to affirm the independence of his nation. He extended a hand to the United States and the World Bank to help finance the construction of the Aswan Dam, but they both refused, he was forced to turn to the Soviet Union.

On July 26, 1956, Nasser made what should have been done decades before: he expelled the British colonials from the Suez Canal zone. «July 26 in Alexandria, in his calm, but one that has been described by London as hysterical, Nasser made its announcement of nationalization, which, from a strictly legal point of view, was only ‘a decision to redeem the shareholders’. That night at Downing Street, [British Anthony Prime Minister] bitterness of the Eden decision was not hide guests… Eden convened a Council of war, which is continued until 04:00 an emotional Prime Minister said to his colleagues that Nasser could not, in the words of the Eden, ‘ have the hand on our windpipe. ‘ Mussolini’ Muslim ‘ must be « destroyed ». Eden said: « I want him removed and I don’t give a damn if there is anarchy and chaos in Egypt… » Former Prime Minister Churchill had powered fire of Eden advising him on the Egyptians, saying: « ‘ tell them if we have more than their plays will set us the Jews on them and drive them into the gutter, where they should have ever released. »  » « [5] .

Sir Anthony Nutting, Member of the Foreign Office at the time, remembers a furious call of the Eden, who was upset by the slow pace of the campaign against Nasser. Eden is rage, « what is all this nonsense that you sent to me? » … What is all this nonsense on Nasser of isolation or « neutralize » him, as you call it? I want him destroyed, can’t understand you? I want him murdered… «  »[6] ‘  »

The current face of the MB:
Hired killers from the West and Saudi Arabia

Arrest of Nasser of its leaders and the banning of the Organization was not killed off the coast of the brotherhood in Egypt. It had already sunk its roots deep inside the country and as the case of Sadat, there its hosts within the army as well. One of the reasons is perhaps that the Egyptian population was not fully aware of the controllers of the Brotherhood who were considered a native outfit opposing Western colonial forces. Formal opposition of the fraternity to the Israeli occupation of Palestine could be yet another element for its survival.

The other reason, of course, was the intensification of the cold war, and the Brotherhood was examined by an anglophile Western decision-makers article as the poison that could kill the Soviet Union. This was exposed in the 1980s, when the Soviet army invaded the Afghanistan and Western and the Saudis, among other Sunni Arabs of the Persian Gulf, brought into killers in waving the flag of the Islamic Jihad. There were followers of the brotherhood, working under various organizational structures.

Nevertheless, that the ban on the brotherhood of Nasser did accomplish was the internationalization of the brotherhood, bringing to his topic various militant Sunni groups widely identified as the Salafists and Saudi Arabia a poison pill, the Wahhabis. These forces were entirely in the spotlight at the recent rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, after the dismantling of the Mubarak regime, which has developed Morsi, a U.S. educated Egyptian engineer, the bar in Cairo.

Nasser following the prohibition of holding, most of the brothers ended up in Saudi Arabia, but not all. Some have fled to Syria, where students returning from Egypt in the 1930s had founded a branch. Finally, the Syrian Government crush under its heel and send the brothers to rush again, especially to Saudi Arabia, but some in the Germany of the West (where they would establish cells that have paved the way for the September 11, 2001). Others have remained in Syria, driven underground, but not out of existence. [7]

But nobody has contributed more that her Majesty’s Service in Britain bringing these scattered jihadists under decisions and weakly related organizations them flourish. The British protection of the Islamic terrorist leaders years ago, although it is difficult to nail down exactly when.

Free Kabul radio was formed almost immediately after the Soviet invasion of 1979 of the Afghanistan, by Lord Nicholas Bethell, a former Lord-in-waiting to Queen Elizabeth II. Lord Bethell had used Mideast and Soviet sections of MI6. The Committee for a free Afghanistan (CFA) was founded in 1981 as a result of a trip by Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Lord Bethell to the United States, dedicated to building support for the Mujahideen. It has funded almost all of the ‘Peshawar seven’ groups of the Mujahideen.

Osama bin Laden ran the Committee of Jihad, which included the Egyptian Islamic Group, the Organization of the Jihad in the Yemen, the Group Pakistani al-Hadith, the League of Lebanese supporters, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, the Group of Beit-el-Imam, Jordan and Algeria Islamic Group. He had already established an office in London, according to reports.

According to September Michael Whine 2005 paper Hudson Institute, « The Advance of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United Kingdom », in 1996, the first representative of the MB in Britain, Kamal el-Helbawy, an Egyptian, said, « there’s not many Members here, but many Muslims in Britain intellectually support the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood. » He added that at that time, the purpose of the MB in Britain was only disseminate information about Islam, the Islamic issues and movements and correct distortions and misunderstandings created by « different forces against Islam ». In September 1999, the MB has opened a « global information centre » in London. A press release published in Muslim News said that it « specialize in promotion opportunities and positions of the Muslim Brotherhood and [communicate] between global Islamic movements and the mass media. »

In July 1998, a former officer of the British MI5, David Shayler, has revealed that in February 1996, the security services British funding and supported an Islamic terrorist group based in London, in an attempt to assassinate the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. British Minister for Foreign Affairs Malcolm Rifkind, in an interview with the British Daily Mail, sanctioned by the action. Speaking to the BBC on August 5, 1998, Shayler said: « we paid £100 000 for the murder of a foreign head of State. It is outside the fact that money has been used to kill innocent people, because the bomb went off at the wrong time. In fact, it is awful to financing of international terrorism. »

The Saudis complained several times to the British authorities on the activity of the expatriate, Mohammed al-Massari, who has called for the overthrow of the House of Saud and asked for his extradition with special emphasis. He was rumored to be allied with Osama bin Laden, who apparently kept his residence in the wealthy London suburb of Wembley. According to the same sources, London is also the headquarters of bin Laden Advise and Reform Commission, led by Khaled al-Fawwaz .

November 17, 1997, the Gamaa al-Islamiya Group conducted a massacre of tourists in Luxor, Egypt, where 62 people have been killed. Since 1992, the terrorist attacks carried out by this gang were at least 92 victims. However, according to the authorities Egyptian, the leaders of this organization have been provided with political asylum in Britain, and repeated efforts to extradite them have encountered severe rebuffs.

On December 14, 1997, British Ambassador to Egypt David Baltherwick was summoned by the then-Minister of Foreign Affairs Amr Moussa Egypt and handed an official note, require Britain « stop providing shelter to terrorists and cooperate with Egypt to combat terrorism ». In an interview with the London Times on the same day, Moussa called for Britain « stop the flow of money from radical Islamists in London to terrorist groups in Egypt and to prohibit the preachers in British mosques, calling for the assassination of foreign leaders ». The Times added that Moussa was « shocked by reports that £2.5 million came from exiles in Britain to the Gamaa Hizb-al-islamiya ». [8]

Alternatively, take the case of Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the MB. He was imprisoned under King Farouq in 1949, then three times during the reign of President Nasser, until he left Egypt at the Qatar in 1961. He arrived in London in 2004, according to the Muslims of Britain (MAB) Association. August 11, 2004, Anthony Browne, in his Chronicle with the spectator, entitled « The Triumph of the East, » stressed that Qaradawi, who was greeted by the Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone (« Red Ken »), when it was broadcast in 1999, according to the Middle East Media Research Institute, left said: « Islam will return in Europe. ». The conquest need not necessarily be by the sword. Perhaps we will conquer this land without armies. We want an army of preachers and teachers who present Islam in all languages and in all dialects. »

Al-Qaradawi is returned to Egypt in 2011 in the wake of the Egyptian revolution.

Londonistan: Refuge for Islamist terrorists

Because of the myriad of small groups of Islamic terrorists operating out of Britain under the protection of the MI6 and the British Government, it was the French who began to call the British capital « Londonistan ». In the 1990s, the French security services have become worried and frustrated by the growing presence of Algerian Islamists who have used London as a rear base to carry out their terrorist campaign against the France. They were for most, but not all, members of the armed Islamic Group (Group Islamic army, GIA) .

According to French, the GIA sources, who was responsible for the assassination of Algerian President Mohamed Boudiaf, 29 June 1992, has its international headquarters in London. Sheikh Abu Qatabda, who was recently extradited to Jordan and Abu Musab press release of the military orders to terrorists GIA operating in Algeria and France through the body of the party based in London, al-Ansar .

Sheikh Abu Qatabda was granted asylum in Britain in 1992, after being sentenced to death in Algeria for having acknowledged the responsibility of the explosion of a bomb at Algiers airport. A third GIA leader based in London, Abu Fares, supervises the operations against the France. He received asylum in Britain in 1992, after being sentenced to death in Algeria for having acknowledged the responsibility of the same operation that killed nine people and 125 injured at Algiers airport. He was also suspected of bombing of three train stations and the Paris metro and an open-air market. France has requested the extradition of some of the terrorists in connection with the attacks the bomb in Paris during the 1980s. The British authorities considered, however, that they should be granted asylum provided that they had not committed any crime on British soil.

Among the Arab Islamist ideologues who had obtained asylum – and in some cases, the undefined right of residence or the same British nationality – was Rashid Ismail, who heads the Tunisian party Ennahda . Ismail had left Tunisia at the end of a term of imprisonment for terrorist offences in 1989. After 22 years in Britain, he returned to Tunisia to take control of the brotherhood, after the fall of President Zine el Abidin Ben Ali in 2001. In 2012, he was awarded the Royal Institute of International Affairs by Prince Andrew, Duke of York, for ‘compromise success obtained in the course of the democratic transition of the Tunisia’.

Next to the members of the Libyan fighting group , which were returned to Libya in 2011. to kill Gaddafi, protected Britain and allowed to flourish the Syrian expatriate Omar Bakri Fostock (aka Omar Bakri Mohammed), which, with another Syrian expatriates, Farid Kassim, founded a branch of Hizb ut-Tahrir (Party of Islamic liberation, HT) in 1986. He arrived in Britain after being expelled from Saudi Arabia, where he claims that he fled to Syria after the Suppression of late President Hafez al-Assad the MB. In Saudi Arabia, he claims that he was active in another group with a similar ideology, al-Muhajiroun (the emigrants). HT has now become an international terrorist outfit with a strong presence in Central Asia, Pakistan and the North of the Lebanon.

In 2006, National Public Radio, citing an article in the New Statesman , noted that Britain was « planning » to engage with the Muslim Brotherhood. NPR said:

« Well, the memo is a member of the Office of Foreign Affairs Israel, Arab and North African working group. And it’s part of the broader strategy in the Foreign Office called « engage with the Islamic world ». This person is suggesting other various officials within the British Government that they must, indeed, engage with political Islam and engage specifically with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and also recommends that American and European countries do the same thing. There was a study of MI6 in the British Government who says that there is no direct violence which is caused by the Muslim Brotherhood, although certain gifts are likely to find their way to Hamas and others… »

Finally, a preview of what some of the British security think than the MB: Dr. Robert Lambert, the former head of Muslim unit of the Metropolitan Police London Contact, wrote in an article in the New Statesman, December 5, 2011, that « Britain can be proud of how it provided a safe haven for members and associates of the Muslim Brotherhood over the past three decades. » Many escape from prison and torture in the country led by corrupt dictators, strongly supported by the West until the Arab spring. Now some are returning to their country of origin to help build new democracies and bulwark against future dictatorships in the Arab world. »

[1] http://english.nuqudy.com/North_Africa/Will_Morsi_Sell_the-2989

[2] Mark Curtis, secret: Collusion of Britain with the Radical Islam (London: Ltd. the tail of the snake, 2010).

[3] ami Isseroff,  » the Muslim Brotherhood – Hitler – Al Qaeda .  »

« http://tulisanmurtad.blogspot.fr/2012/04/muslim-brotherhood-nazi-connection.html

[4]  »  » Muslim Brotherhood: shock troops of London for the new dark ages ,  » EIR, may 8-14 May 1979. .


[5] Stephen Dorril, MI6: Inside the Covert World of the Secret Intelligence Service of his Majesty (New York: Free Press, 2000).

[6] Evelyn Shuckburgh, descent to Suez, Foreign Office Diaries 1951-1956: the previous Government of Churchill to the Suez crisis under his successor handpicked, Anthony Eden (London: W.W. Norton, 1986).

[7] Robert Baer, sleeping with the devil (New York: Crown Publishers, 2003).

[8] Hichem Karoui, ‘ link with Britain: is it an Islamist plot against the West run from London? .  »  » Media monitors network, 24 September 2001.

« … There have been of many related sequential coincidences throughout my life, incidents which, in themselves, would have led down statistically, the odds against the same or a related sequence of events that occur in the same person are astronomically high. It is a series of incidents that have convinced me that God had a hand in my life. I do not believe in fate. I do not believe in an accident…

« We were taught lies. The reality is not at all what we perceive that it is. We can survive over a long time by hanging on the lies of the past. Reality must be discerned at all costs if we want to be part of the future. Truth must prevail in all cases, no matter who it hurts and can help, if we want to continue to live on this earth. At this point, what we can be is more important. This is what we must do to ensure our survival that counts. The old way is in certain process of destruction and a new world order is beating the door…

« I’m scared for the little ones, the innocent, who are already paying for our mistakes. There is a large army of orphaned children professionally. They attend day-care centres controlled by the Government. And child lock key are running wild in the streets. And the children of lopsided, emotionally wounded single welfare mothers, born only for more money reasons on the monthly check. Open your eyes and watch, because they are the future. In them, I see the sure and certain destruction of this once-proud nation. In their vacant eyes I see the death of freedom. They carry with them a large vacuum – and someone will surely pay a great price for their suffering.

« If we do not act in concert with others and ensure that the future becomes what it should be, then we will be certainly deserve regardless of the fate that awaits us.

« I believe with all my heart that God put me in places and positions throughout my life that I would be able to deliver this warning to his people. I pray that I was worthy and that I have done my work.

« THIS IS MY CREED – I first believe in God, the same God where my ancestors believed. » I believe in Jésus Christ, and that he is my Savior. Secondly, I believe in the Constitution of the Republic of the United States of America, without interpretation, because it was written and intended to operate. I gave my oath sacred « to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic. » I intend to carry out this oath. Thirdly, I believe that the family unit and in particular, my family unit. I swore that I give my life, if necessary, in defense of God, the Constitution, or my family. Fourthly, I believe that no matter what a man without principles that it is ready and willing to die at any given time is already dead and no use or consequence whatsoever. »

William Cooper,
August 3, 1990, Camp Verde, Arizona

« … Initially, I wrote this piece as a research document. It was first delivered to the MUFON Symposium on July 2, 1989, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Most of this knowledge comes directly, or as a result of my own research in TOP SECRET/MAJIC material which I have seen and read between the years 1970 and 1973 as a member of the team of information Intelligence of the Commander in Chief of the Pacific fleet. Since some of this information came from sources that I can’t disclose for obvious reasons and published sources, which I can’t guarantee… (that) should be called a hypothesis.

, I firmly believe that if the aliens are real, this is THE TRUE NATURE OF THE BEAST. It is the only scenario that answers all the QUESTIONS and place the various fundamental mysteries in an arena that makes sense. This is the only explanation which shows the chronology of events and shows that the chronologies, once assembled, fit perfectly. Most of this seems to me to be true if the material I’ve seen in the Navy is authentic. For the rest, I do not know, and that is why this article should be called a hypothesis. Past and current available evidence supports this hypothesis.  »

Update : Bill was killed by the Apache county sheriffs Department during a raid on his home in November 2001. He is now buried on a hill in Eagar, Arizona.

InfoWars website

Tim Russert asks President Sunday (08/02/2004) on the Skull and Bones and the President confirms that it is a Member saying that he can not talk.

Part of the transcript below.

President Bush: policy. I mean, it’s – you know, if you close your eyes and listen carefully to what you have just said, this looks like the year 2000 all over again.

Russert: you were both in the skull and bones, the secret society.

President Bush: it is so secret that we cannot talk about it.

Russert: do you mean for America what? The conspiracy theorists will be unleashed.

President Bush: I do not know that they are. I do not know. I have not yet seen the (unintel). (Laughs)

Russert: number 322.

President Bush: first of all, it is not the candidate, and I look forward

Bush keeps mum on the company secret
WASHINGTON (AFP) – US debate President George w. Bush on the Iraq, the November elections and the war against terrorism in an interview broadcast Sunday but in laughing stonewalled a question about his company secret of the University.

« It is no secret, we cannot talk about, » he told NBC television when asked about the fact that he and the Democratic leader, Senator John Kerry, are members of the University of Yale Skull and Bones.

Although graduation just two years apart, and the company was reportedly only inducts 15 new « Bonesmen » per year, Bush curtly denied knowing his rival during their stay at the College.

Bush’s father, former President George Bushand his grandfather, Prescott Bush, were also members, incommunicado on the comings and goings in their seats as mausoleum on the school’s urban campus.

Other members include was an another former President, William Howard Taft; Adviser to White House in Viet Nam-era McGeorge Bundy; and financier and diplomat W. Averell Harriman.

Election shows where bones are buried
The Scots

NOBODY answers when you hit on the iron gates of the Skull and Bones society in the middle of the campus of Yale University. If you hit, you are not wanted.

Behind the Greco-Egyptian façade on the main street in New Haven, the company is expected to be one of the most powerful and influential in the United States.

Now, for the first time two Bonesmen, as members are known, could go head to head for the position of president of the United States of America and Commander in Chief.

Skull and Bones is a network social and political, not like the others. With all its rituals and macabre relics, it was founded in 1832 as a new version of the world of student secret societies which were common in Germany at the time. Since then, he has chosen or ‘typed’ only 15 students per year, which become the Patriarchs when they get their diploma – life members of the ultimate old boys’ club.

Bush (1968) admitted being a Bonesman in his autobiography:

« My last year [at Yale], I joined Skull and Bones, a secret society, so secret, I can’t say anything more.  »

Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts (1966), currently the favorite in the race to become the Democratic candidate for the November presidential election, revealed his membership to the company in an interview for the American TV show Meet the Press.

Although Howard Dean (1971) never said if he was a member of Skull and Bones, the former Governor of Vermont is a graduate of Yale.

Since 1988, three graduates of Yale led to the United States. George Bush Sr and Bill Clinton have both participated in the University, although the latter was operated not for be a Bonesman. This succession of Yale is historic. Never before have successive American presidents attended the University even three (or even two).

The Bush family has been linked to Skull and Bones for generations. Prescott Bush, grandfather of George w. (1917) was a member of the gang who stole for the company, which became one of its most precious artifacts: a skull that was supposed to be that of the Apache Geronimo head, were later turned out to be false.

George Herbert Walker Bush (1948) was also a Bonesman.

Alexandra Robbins, author of Secrets of the Tomb: Skull and Bones, the Ivy League, and the hidden paths of power, said George w. « a somewhat ambivalent » Bonesman.

She said:

« Secret names are assigned to the new members of Skull and Bones , by what will of Bonesmen colleague never know them. George w. has not been assigned a name but prompt to choose a. According to a report, nothing comes to mind, so that he was given the temporaryname, who said he has never bothered to replace.  »

The conspiracy theories and the hysteria surrounding the reporting of the influence of the company. Its rituals are supposed to be weird. Insiders must masturbate in a coffin while recounting their sexual exploits, for which they will be rewarded a strings-attached gift of $15 000.

Kerry often told his fellow Bonesmen of his political ambitions. Even then, he knew that he could pursue a career in public service and aim for the top.

Clark Abbott recollection of a brief exchange with Kerry during their first week at Yale.

« I met this great man, athletic allure of St Paul [an elite boarding school in New Hampshire] and I asked him: »what do you do?’  » Abbott said. Answer Kerry stunned Abbott: ‘I would like to be president of the United States.

Kerry has worked hard and played hard at Yale. Often, he woke up at 05:00 to study and went to Pamplona in Spain to run with the Bulls with fellow David Thorne.

Dean was at Yale from 1967 to 1971, the type who invited you back into his room to finish with the drum that was left by the social activities, he participated in the Organization, said friend has Richard, a national correspondent for the newspaper USA Today.

With regard to policy, there was no indication that the doctor aspiring Upper East side in New York is moving towards a career in the Government.

« It was political, but it was not certainly think of being holder of a political office, and even less a President, » said roommate Ralph Dawson, 54, lawyer in New York.

Back to Skull & Bones

Back to Bush
by Antony C. Sutton


from ModernHistoryProject Web Site

Y has an explanation of the conspiracy of recent history?

During the last hundred years, any theory of history or the historical facts which does not fall within a model established by the American Historical Association and the major foundations with their power of foundations has been attacked or rejected–not on the basis of the present evidence, but based on the acceptability of the argument to the liberal establishment is called and its official historical line.

There is a history of the settlement, an official history, which dominates history, publishing, media and library shelves of trade manuals. The official line always takes into account events such as wars, revolutions, scandals, murders, are events without link more or less random. By definition, events can never be the result of a plot, they can never result from premeditated action planned group.

We’ll argue and present specific evidence detailed (including the names, dates and places) that the only reasonable explanation for the recent history of the United States is that there is a plot to use political power for purposes that are incompatible with the Constitution… If there may be a plot on the market, so why not in the arena political?

Most of the CFR members are not involved in a conspiracy and have no knowledge of any conspiracy… However, there is a group within the Council on Foreign Relations which belongs to a secret society, incommunicado, and that more or less controls the rate of fatality [whose] meetings are used for their own purposes.

These members are in order. Their membership in the order can be proven. Their meetings can be proven. Their objectives are clearly unconstitutional. And This command existed for 150 years in the United States.
Agenda: what it is and how it began
Those inside knowledge as the order. For legal purposes, the order consists the confidence of Russell in 1856. It was also once known as the « Brotherhood of death ». « . Those who make light of it… call it « Skull & Bones ».

The American chapter of this German order was founded in 1833 at Yale University in general William Huntington Russell and Alphonso Taft , who in 1876, became Secretary of war in the administration of grants. Alphonso Taft was the father of William Howard Taft, the only man to both president and Chief Justice of United States.

The order is not just another campus Greek letter fraternal society. Chapter 322 is a secret society whose members are sworn to silence. It is not at all satisfied from looks, probing citizens – known to insiders as the ‘aliens’ or ‘Vandals’. Its members still refuse membership (or are supposed to refuse membership). First and foremost, the order is powerful, incredibly powerful. (see note E1 )

The order is a senior year company that exists only at Yale. The members are chosen during his Junior year and spend a year on campus, the past year, Skull & Bones. In other words, the Organization faces the outside world post diploma.

There are two other senior at Yale societies… Scroll & Key and Wolf’s head are supposedly competitive companies based in the middle of the 19th century. We believe to be part of the same network.

What is the meaning of « 322 » in the Chapter 322?… [A] interpretation is that the order is the descendant of a Greek fraternal dating from Demosthenes in 322 B.C. society… Os files have been dated by adding 322 for the current year, i.e. the originating documents from 1950 are dated Anno Demostheni 2272.

Each year, 15 years and only 15 [new members] are selected. During the 150 years about 2500 Yale graduates were initiated into the order. On both the 500-600 are alive and active. About about a quarter of them take an active role in promoting the goals of the agenda. Others lose interest or would change their opinion.

The most likely potential member is a family of os, that is resourceful, energetic and political and, probably, an amoral team player… Honour and financial rewards are guaranteed by the power of order. But the price of these honours and awards is the sacrifice to the common goal, the goal of the order.

Entry in the order is accompanied by a complex ritual… The neophyte is renamed… like a monk , Knight of Malta or St. John, [he] becomes such Knight. The old Knights are then known as Patriarch thus and so. The outside world are known as the nice and the vandals.

It is instructive to compare 1833 with 1983 and how, during the century and a half scale, a group of 20 to 30 families came to dominate the agenda. It seems that active members have enough clout to push their sons and members of the family in the order and it is significant inter-marriage among families.

These families fall into two broad categories.

· First , we find former line of American families who arrived on the coast is in the 1600s (Whitney, Lord, Phelps, Wadsworth, Allen, Bundy, Adams and so forth).

· Second , we find families who bought wealth over the past 100 years, sent their sons to Yale and in time became almost old families of lines (Rockefeller, Harriman, Davison, Payne).

An example is the family of the Lord. The first Lord to be initiated in the order was Lord of DeForest George (1854), a New York lawyer [and founder of] the firm of New York from the Lord, day and Lord. In the next hundred years, more than five Lords were initiated into the order, [including] Winston Lord (1959). (see note E2 )
How much is known about the order?
It is known that an article have been published in the past 100 years on the agenda [in 1983]. Unfortunately, it is a superficial, almost mocking review and provides a few lights but small contribution to historical knowledge. The article is « last Secrets of Skull and Bones » by Ron Rosenbaum (Esquire, September 1977). Rosenbaum graduated from Yale, attracted by the possibilities of shadow of a secret society to control the world.

This author does however, have copies of the books ‘Address’, which was called « catalogs ». These are lists of members, all the way back to 1832. With these, we can reconstruct a picture of reasons, objectives and operations.

The shares of each of the members are already saved in open history and archives. In determining which members enter a scene, what they were doing, what they argued they appointed and when they faded, we can assemble models and deduct targets.
In this society secret?
Most members are from the coast East of the United States. The members are all men and almost all of the White Anglo-Saxon Protestants. In large part that they were descended from the English Puritan families. These families intermarried with the power financial or guests… the bumps of money which the sons became members of the order.

A family of keys is the Whitney, descended from the English Puritans, who came to the United States about 1635. Eight Whitney were members of the order. William Collins Whitney (1863) and his two sons, W. Payne Whitney (1898) and Harry Payne Whitney (1894), are at the heart of the Whitney influence in the Decree which survives today through the Harriman family and intermarriage with Paynes and Vanderbilt.

Assumption number one:

A secret society dominated by the old line of American families and new wealth existed from 1833 to the present day.

· Lord of family (1635, Cambridge Mass.)

· The Bundy family (1635, Boston, Massachusetts.)

· Phelps family (1630, Dorchester Mass.)

· Whitney family (1635, Watertown Mass.)

· Perkins family (1631, Boston Massachusetts.)

· Stimson family (1635, Watertown Mass.)

· Taft family (1679, Braintree Mass.)

· Wadsworth family (1632, Newtown Mass.)

· Family Gilman (1638, Hingham Mass.)

· Rockefeller (Standard Oil) family

· Family Payne (Standard Oil)

· Family Harriman (railroads)

· Family Davison (J.P. Morgan)

· Family Weyerhauser (wood)

· Pillsbury family (milling)

· Family Sloane (detail)
William Collins Whitney (1841-1904) is a fine example of how members of the order amount to the fame and fortune. W.C. Whitney launched in 1863… In the last three decades of the century, he wrapped a huge fortune, became a power behind the throne in the administration of Cleveland and directed activities often unscrupulous group of capitalists, known as « the Whitney group.

William married Flora Payne, daughter of Standard Oil Treasurer Oliver Payne. Their two sons, Harry Payne Whitney (1894), and Payne Whitney (1898), went to Yale and became members of the order. After Yale, Harry Payne Whitney quickly married Gertrude Vanderbilt in 1896. [His son] Cornelius Vanderbilt Whitney married Marie Norton. After their divorce, Marie Norton Whitney married W. Averell Harriman (1913). Are these tight woven family and financial locks that are the core of the agenda.

The elder Harriman, a tycoon of the eminent and not too scrupulous railway, sent his two sons to Yale. William Averell Harriman (1913) and Edward Roland Noel Harriman (1917) joined the order. It is perhaps this Harriman and his fellow bankers have dominated the direction of the order in recent decades.

In the 1930s, W.A. Harriman & company merged with Brown Brothers. It was an old financial House whose partners were also members of the order. By the 1970s, the international banking firm private relatively unknown to Brown Brothers Harriman, with assets on half a billion dollars, had taken so many of ‘the brotherhood’ on 26 individual partners, not less than 9 were members of the order.

And to make it more interesting, Prescott Bush, father of the Vice President George H.W. Bush (both in the order), was a partner of Brown Brothers Harriman for more than 40 years. (see note E3 )

Finally, because Brown Brothers Harriman is a private banking company it has relatively no Government control and does not publish an annual report. In other words, we know nothing of its activities – at least we know nothing about sources of Brown Brothers Harriman .

Brown Brothers Harriman the Wall Street Journal, has announced 11 July 1972 list partners.


J. Eugene Banks
Moreau D. Brown
Walter H. Brown
Prescott Bush
Granger Costikyan
William R. Driver Jr.
Terrence M. Farley
Elbridge T. Gerry
John C. Hanson
E.R. Harriman
Frank W. Hoch
Stephen Y. Hord
R.L. Ireland III
F.H. Kingsbury Jr
Robert A. Lovett
John B. Madden
Thomas McCance
L.J. Newquist
William F. Ray
Robert V. Roosa
L. parks Shipley
Maarten van Hengel
John C. West
Knight Wooley
Louis Curtis
W. Averell Harriman

Partner of Brown Brothers Harriman, who were also members of the order:

Walter H. Brown (1945)
S. Prescott Bush (1917)
Granger K. Costikyan (1929)
E.R. Harriman (1917)
Stephen Y. Hord (1921)
Robert A. Lovett (1918)
John B. Madden (1941)
Knight Wooley (1917)
W. Averell Harriman (1913)
In many respects, these old families of Yankee’s line have outsmarted the bankers. [They] diversion wealth of bankers to their own objectives without always absorb the families of banker. Order control substantial wealth of Andrew Carnegie, but no Carnegie was already a member.

Agenda used Ford wealth so blatantly against the wishes of the Ford family that two colleagues had resigned from the Board of Directors of the Ford Foundation. No Ford has been a member of the order. The Morgan name has never appeared on the composition of lists, although some partners of Morgan are with inner core, for example, Davison and Perkins.
What organizations it penetrated?
The order has implemented or penetrated almost all significant research, policy and opinion-making organization in the United States, in addition to the Church, business, law, Government and politics… The evolution of American society is not and has not been for a century, a voluntary development, reflecting the separate opinion… Instead, the thrust was artificially created and stimulated by the order.

It is a situation very much as Quigley found in ‘The group’ [based at Oxford University in England]:

« It is likely that most of the members of the outer circle were unaware that they were used by a secret society. »

Agenda Gets the ball rolling in new organizations; [he] puts in the first president or president and ideas and then when operations are rolling along, fades often just out of the picture.

The universities include Cornell University, where Andrew Dickson White (1853) was its first president and Johns Hopkins, based on the German education system, University where Daniel Coit Gilman (1852) was the first President (1875-1901).

University associations the American Historical Association, the American Economic Association, the American Chemical Society and the American Psychological Association have all started by members of the order or persons close to the order.

The first president of the Carnegie Institution (from 1902-05) was Daniel Coit Gilman, but other members of the order are on the boards of Carnegie since the turn of the century. Gilman was on the scene for the creation of Peabody, Slater and Russell Sage foundations. McGeorge Bundy (1940) was president of the Ford Foundation from 1966 to 1979.

The first president of the American society for the settlement of international disputes was a member William Howard Taft (1878). The company was the forerunner of the League to enforce peace, which became the concept of the League of Nations and, ultimately, in The United Nations. In the Organization of the United Nations that we find, for example, Archibald MacLeish (1915), who was the brains behind the Organization of the UNESCO constitution .

In 1960, James Jeremiah Wadsworth (1927) set up the Institute for peace research. In 1963, it has merged to become the Institute of political studies, and Marcus Rashking , who was the help of the National Security Council McGeorge Bundy (1940), a very active member of The order.

Penetration of key is the Union Theological Seminary, affiliated with Columbia University in New York. Henry Sloane Coffin (1897) was Professor of practical theology at Union since 1904-26 and president… from 1926 to 1945.

Major firms set up in New York City are saturated with agenda. Lord, day and Lord dominated by the family of the Lord; Simpson, Thacher and Bartlett, particularly the Thacher family; David, Polk, Wardwell; and Debevoise, Plimpton, the Rockefeller family law firm.

There has been a significant penetration in the communication. A few examples:

· Henry Luce (1920), time-life

· William Buckley Jr. (1950), National review

· Alfred Cowles (1913), President of Cowles Communications

· Emmert Bates (1932), Litton educational systems

· Richard Ely Danielson (1907), of the Atlantic Monthly

· Russell Wheeler Davenport (1923), Fortune

· John Chipman Farrar (1918), the Publisher Farrar, Straus

The most prestigious award in journalism is an Nieman Fellowship at Harvard University. The first Director of the Nieman Fund was a member Archibald MacLeish (1915).

Pierre Jay (1892) became the first president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Politics and Government is the area where the order has made progress, with names like Taft, Bush, Stimson, Chafee, Lovett, Whitney, Bundy and so forth.
Operations of the order
In 1981, « The Anglo American establishment » by Carroll Quigley was published in New York. Quigley described in detail the historical activities of the establishment of British, controlled by a secret society and an operation very as far as the order operates in the United States

The secret society British, known as « the Group »… was founded at the University of Oxford, as far as the order was founded at Yale. The Group operates in a series of concentric circles and as the order is composed of old families of lines combine private merchant bankers, known in the United States as investment bankers.

The objective of the group is registered in Cecil Rhodes’ will be:

« The extension of British rule in the world, the development of a system of immigration from the United Kingdom and the settlement by British subjects of all lands… and the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as part of the British Empire. »

The Group and order are unwilling or unable to establish a global society by voluntary process, so they opted for the constraint. To do this, they have created wars and revolutions, they put at bag treasuries, they are oppressed, they looted, they lied – even to their countrymen.

The activities of the order are directed to the evolution of our society, change the world, to achieve a new world order. This will be a planned order with very restricted individual freedom, without protection of the Constitution, without borders or cultural distinction… Part of this activity was in collaboration with the Group, with its parallel and recorded the objectives.

We know the elements in society which should be amended in order to achieve this new world order. We can then review the actions of the order in this context.

· Education: how the population of the future will behave

· Silver: the means to retain wealth and exchanging goods

· Right: the power to enforce the will of the State

· Policy: the direction of the State

· Economy: wealth creation

· History: what people believe that is passed in the past

· Psychology: the means to control the way people think

· Philanthropy: then people think well controllers

· Medicine: the authority on health, life and death

· Religion: people’s spiritual beliefs, the call to action for many

· Media: what people know and learn more about current events

· Continuity: the power to appoint following your footsteps

Agenda next shot of was to control the foundations. They’ve got all the most great – Ford, Carnegie, Peabody and Slater, Russell Sage and so forth. As in education, the modus operandi of the order was to first obtain and prepare the ground for the future. The initial objective was to establish a direction in an organization. Selection of intuitive or pretty unethical managers take branch has maintained the momentum. (see note ) E4 )

When it comes to activities by individual members, at first glance the model is confusing and superficially incompatible. [For example], in the 1920s, W. Averell Harriman was a first supporter of the Soviets with financial and diplomatic assistance. Harriman participated in the Ruskombank, the first Soviet commercial bank. Max may, vice-president of Guaranty Trust, dominated by the interests of Harriman-Morgan, became the first vice-president of Ruskombank responsible for its operations abroad.

But we also find that Averell Harriman, his brother Roland Harriman and E.S. James members and Knight Wooley, through the Bank of the Union (which they hold an interest) have been major funders of Hitler.

Now, our textbooks tell us that the Nazis and the Soviets were fierce enemies and [that] their systems are opposed. How could a rational person support the Soviets and Nazis at the same time? Irrational Harriman or explainable inconsistencies?

The answer is, [the actions] are not at all incompatible: because the purpose of the order is well beyond these actions and actually needs this semblance of contradictions.

The objective of the order is ‘left’ or ‘Right’. Left and right are of artificial devices to bring about changeand the politics of left and right extremes are essential elements in a controlled change process.

Do not forget that Marx and Hitler, the extremes of ‘left’ and ‘right’ presented as enemies for manuals, evolved from the same philosophical system: Hegelianism… The dialectical process are not from Marx (as Marxists claim), but with Fitche and Hegel at the end of the 18th and early 19th century in Germany. In the dialectical process, a clash of opposites results in a synthesis… This conflict of opposites is essential to make changes.

In addition, for systems based on Hegel and Hegel, the State is absolute. The State requires full obedience of every citizen. An individual does not exist for itself in these so-called organic systems, but only to play a role in the functioning of the State. Only in obedience to the State, he finds freedom.

This, then, is a vital part of our explanation of the order. When its co-founder, William Russell was in the Germany in 1831-32, it there was no way he could have avoided discussion and Hegelian theory. It is the talk of the campus. He swept the intellectual Germany…

Most of us believe that the State exists to serve the individual, not the opposite. The order considers the opposite… The discussion and funding is still to the power of the State, use and individual rights of State power… As long as human rights are not introduced into the discussion of the clash of ideas generates the necessary conflict for change.
How the order relates to the CFR and similar organizations
Organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) do not match the requirements of a conspiracy. They are simply too big and their membership is not secret. The list of members of the order never appeared so far. Any person may obtain a list of the members of the CFR and Trilateral Commission (TC).

Large open organizations are a discussion forum, a place where ideas can be expelled around… where people can be evaluated, where discreet commentary and criticism can be made to a nosy press… They are not elected bodies, but which operates they are conspiracies…

The order is represented in these organisations, but not always dominates. David Rockefeller, former Chairman of the CFR, is not a member of the order (only Percy Rockefeller represented the family), but the current President [1983], Winston Lord.

We can represent the relationship between the order and the major groups as a series of concentric circles:

· The outer circle – of large organizations opened with some members from the order

· The inner circle – consisting of one or more of the secret societies as Chapter 322.

· The inner core – a secret society within a society. It is the central part of decision making. We cannot prove [that] there, but logic suggests that some members of the inner circle will form an Executive Committee, an action group, a core internal.

The outer circle
The Council on Foreign Relations is the largest organization in the outer circle. It has about 2,500 members at any time, provided that the order throughout its history. The case fatality rate dates back to 1922. [For example], the following are members of the order and the case fatality rate:

· Jonathan Bingham, Member of Congress

· William F. Buckley, National Review Editor

· McGeorge Bundy, the Executive of the Foundation

· William P. Bundy, the Central Intelligence Agency

· George H.W. Bush, Vice President of the United States of America

The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and includes 200 members worldwide, including approximately 77 are American. There is no overlap between the membership. However, trilateral purposes, as described in the literature, are almost identical to those of the order. [Note that] J. Richardson Dilworth, the Rockefeller Family Associates administrative and financial Director is a member of the order.

The Bilderberg Group dates from the 1950s. The measure where we can trace, only William f. Buckley is a member of the Bilderbergers and the order.

The Pilgrim Society dates from 1900. The order does not directly appear on the Executive Committee of the society of Pilgrim, but only through names of family, i.e. Aldrich and Pratt.
Inner Circle
Chapter 322 of the order differs from the CFR, Trilateral Commission and similar organizations in that it really is a company secret. Its goals and membership are not disclosed. He is paranoid about the secret and covering his trail.

Another important distinction between the [circle] outer and the inner circle is funding. Families in the order are closer to foundations more and more sources of financing as the Rockefeller family… Remember, it was the agenda that got Rockefeller on the ground with his general education Board, not vice versa.

If we go back to 1983 over the year 2083, it could be that the Rockefellers will have followed the footsteps of the Carnegies and the Morgans. File names dusty but is more represented in the power unit. (see note E5 )
The chain of Influence
Initiates order are provided for the advancement of career and success, wealth, providing they follow the rule « to agree, you must go along ». Mixed marriages consolidates the power of families and increases their duration of influence. Finally, a chain of influence over the continuity of safeguards several years.

Members of the order are available in all segments of society… The main occupations of members are law, education, business, finance and industry. These five professions represent over three quarters of the membership and these are key to the control of the company fields. Including the least represented sectors of society are those who have the least capacity to influence the structural orientation of the company.

The practice of absolute presentation for the members of the order strives to perpetuate its influence over time dramatically. The order has launched only about 2500 members in its history… each year 15 new members are initiated, no more, no less. Out of the holders of a diploma 30 million [the United States], a few hundred men… are supposed to be able to occupy the high positions within the Government.

In addition, there are approximately 2500 establishments of higher education in the United States. We believe that only those institutions can generate the talent to lead the country?

Four families provides an example of such a chain of influence (Whitney, Stimson, Acheson and Bundy).

[Suitable array of graphics and text – ed]

William (1863)

· His attorney and close associate was Elihu Root

Henry l. Stimson (1888)

· Joins cabinet of Elihu Root in 1890. In 1901, Cabinet becomes Winthrop and Stimson

· Wife Mabel White, Phoenicia of Charles A. White (1854)

· Secretary of war under President William H. Taft (1878), succeeding Elihu Root

· Secretary of State under President Hoover

· Secretary of war under presidents Roosevelt and Truman

Harvey Hollister Bundy (1909)

· Special assistant to Henry Stimson during World War II

· Man key Pentagon on the Manhattan project to develop the atomic bomb

McGeorge Bundy (1940)

· Son of Harvey H. Bundy

· Co-author with Henry Stimson of the book « Active Service in peace and war » (Harper, 1948)

William P. Bundy (1939)

· Son of Harvey H. Bundy

· Editor of the journal Foreign Affairs, while Winston Lord is President of the CFR

Dean Acheson

· Member of the related Scroll & Key society at Yale

· Daughter Mary Acheson married William Bundy

· Son David Acheson is a member of the order
Harvy Hollister Bundy and two of his three sons, William Bundy Putnam and McGeorge Bundy, are senior activists and activism has a Hegelian model – that is to say, creation of the conflict to bring about change. (Summary of their career, click on links – ed)

McGeorge Bundy was national security adviser in the first years of the debacle of the Viet Nam. McGeorge Bundy was at the White House, his brother William P. Bundy was in the far East-related key positions in [the] defense and State departments.

Acting jointly, the Bundy brothers could have absolutely controlled the flow of the Viet Nam of Intelligence, State and defence-related information. We are not saying that this happened; We believe that it is a worthy review hypothesis.
Keep the lid on the Pot
Control of the order’s history, through foundations and the American Historical Association, has been effective. From time to time their plans go awry. The bubbling cauldron of political manipulation… threatens to expand in view of the public.

More effective censorship pure and simple is the use of the political spectrum left-right to neutralize unwelcome and ideas facts or citizens condition just thinking along certain lines. The ‘left’ of the press leaning segment can always be relied on to attack ideas and the ‘right’ information automatically and vice versa.

In fact, the media have been artificially implemented just for this purpose: the Nation and the new Republic on the ‘left’ were funded by Willard Straight using the funds from Payne Whitney (the order). National Review published by William Buckley (The Order) running a perpetual deficit on the ‘right’.

Agenda has several problems:

· The order lives in a force cultural straitjacket -Their knowledge of the world comes from the ingroup and those who play with the ingroup. And the Group has no morality and diversity.

· Easy for the ambitious Outsider prey -Henry Kissinger is a good example – a foreigner who desperately wants to stay inside.

· Genetic problems -Mixed marriages between families raises a serious question of genetic malfunctions.

· Shallow motor base -There is no philosophical or cultural depth agenda; it lacks diversity.

The great strength of individualism, a social order atomistic where he holds ultimate sovereignty, is that any counter-revolution to an imposed social order, where the State is boss can take routes 1 and 1 million forms.

No one is going to create a movement « anti-The Order ». It would be stupid and unnecessary. It could seep, purchased or hijacked all too easily. The movement which will reverse the order should be extremely simple and efficient. It will be ten thousand or 1 million Americans who come to the conclusion that they do not want the State to be boss, they prefer to live under the protection of the Constitution. They will make their own independent decision to thwart the agenda.

In conclusion, it should be noted a point: the understanding of the order and its modus operandi is impossible, unless the reader keeps in mind the Hegelian roots of the game plan… A State system is the objective of the order.

Especially the reader must put aside the descriptive left clichés and right, liberal and conservative, Communist and fascist, even Republican and democratic.

These terms may be important for self-recognition… but they are confusing in our context unless considered essential elements in a game plan. You will never understand the order [or their game plan] If you try to label it right or left.

E1. In the 2004 presidential elections, the two candidates Bush and John F. Kerry were members of the order, which could not happen by chance. In accordance with their oath, both refused to discuss the agenda or their belonging to this. Despite evidence of electoral fraud in the key States, Kerry conceded the election to his ‘brother of the lodge’ George Bush immediately.

E2 . Winston Lord, Member of longtime and former President of the CFR, has had a long career as a policy Planner in various departments under several administrations. Follow the links to learn more.

E3 . George H.W. Bush (1948) was elected President in 1988. His son, Bush (1968), another Member of the order, was elected President in 2000. To learn more about Prescott Bush and Brown Brothers Harriman, see » George Bush: the unauthorized biography « .

E4 . Most bureaucrats in those organizations do not catch of simply ‘ « at the mission, but are recruited as true believers in the cause they think they are in service, it ‘world peace’ or other. Lenin referred to as « useful idiots ».

E5 . In the 1920s as it was written, David Rockefeller, Steven Rockefeller, Jay Rockefeller, etc. – as well as businesses, foundations and corporations they control – are still much a part of the group « power ».

Back to the order of Skull & Bones


Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )


Connexion à %s